1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1985.tb00929.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of ivermectin in sheep following intravenous, intra‐abomasal or intraruminal administration*

Abstract: The pharmacokinetics of ivermectin in plasma following intravenous, intra-abomasal, and intraruminal administration to sheep was determined. When given intravenously, ivermectin was very slowly eliminated with a terminal half-life of 178 h and a volume of distribution at steady state of 5.3 l/kg indicating sequestration in a temporary depot. Intra-abomasal administration resulted in rapid absorption, a peak plasma concentration of 60.6 ng/ml at 4.4 h, and 100% bioavailability. However, intraruminal administrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
50
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
50
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection of a model with two separate gastrointestinal compartments suggests that the local disposition of ivermectin is not the same at all sites of the gastrointestinal tract in terms of (re-)absorption and elimination. This is in line with the experimental finding of a different bioavailability of ivermectin in the rumen and in the abomasum in sheep (75% lower after intraruminal administration than after intra-abomasal administration) [21]. This difference in bioavailability was first attributed to an extensive degradation or metabolisation of ivermectin in the rumen [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selection of a model with two separate gastrointestinal compartments suggests that the local disposition of ivermectin is not the same at all sites of the gastrointestinal tract in terms of (re-)absorption and elimination. This is in line with the experimental finding of a different bioavailability of ivermectin in the rumen and in the abomasum in sheep (75% lower after intraruminal administration than after intra-abomasal administration) [21]. This difference in bioavailability was first attributed to an extensive degradation or metabolisation of ivermectin in the rumen [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This is in line with the experimental finding of a different bioavailability of ivermectin in the rumen and in the abomasum in sheep (75% lower after intraruminal administration than after intra-abomasal administration) [21]. This difference in bioavailability was first attributed to an extensive degradation or metabolisation of ivermectin in the rumen [21]. This explanation, however, is difficult to conciliate with our results, since the unabsorbed fraction of ingested ivermectin was fully recovered in the faeces of the lickers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…Ivermectin is the most extensively studied of the macrocyclic agents; its disposition kinetics was studied in sheep [14,15], cattle [4,16], horses [17], pigs [18], goats [19] and camels [20]. The plasma disposition kinetics of moxidectin has been studied in sheep [21], cattle [4], horses [17], goats [22] and camels [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the therapeutic and persistent efficacy of ivermectin injection against O. ovis were higher than those of oral ivermectin (Dorchies et al, 1997). The greater efficacy of sc injected endectocides is related to pharmacokinetics; the bioavailability of ruminally administered ivermectin was only 25%, whereas that of subcutaneously injected ivermectin was 100% (Prichard et al, 1985). The initial explanation to the low utilisation of orally administered drug was that it was probably metabolised in the rumen, but later evidence indicates that ivermectin is bound to the particles of the digesta (Andrew & Halley, 1996).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics and Route Of Applicationmentioning
confidence: 95%