1997
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1997.56.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of Artemisinin and Artesunate after Oral Administration in Healthy Volunteers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
69
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
69
5
Order By: Relevance
“…DHA has a short elimination half-life (approximately 40 min (Batty et al, 1996(Batty et al, , 1998aBenakis et al, 1997)) but little is known of its metabolism. The supposition that DHA is metabolized to inactive compounds has been supported by a recent study in which pharmacokinetic parameters for DHA were calculated from plasma concentration-time data that were obtained by bioassay (Bethell et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DHA has a short elimination half-life (approximately 40 min (Batty et al, 1996(Batty et al, , 1998aBenakis et al, 1997)) but little is known of its metabolism. The supposition that DHA is metabolized to inactive compounds has been supported by a recent study in which pharmacokinetic parameters for DHA were calculated from plasma concentration-time data that were obtained by bioassay (Bethell et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with data reported from similar clinical studies using selective high performance liquid chromatography (h.p.l.c.) assays (Batty et al, 1996(Batty et al, , 1998aBenakis et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the most rapidly acting of the artemisinin derivatives, exhibiting rapid absorption after oral and intramuscular administration and rapid elimination [8]. Artesunate have been reported to be effective in uncomplicated, severe and multidrug resistant malaria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Previously, the main methods for their quantification were electrochemical detection with detection limits of approximately 10 ng/mL by using sample volumes of approximately 0.5-1 mL plasma or post-column derivatization with methanolic alkali and subsequent ultraviolet detection with limits of detection of approximately 30 ng/mL. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Currently, the suitable method for quantification of these compounds in plasma is liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry detection (LC-Ms or LC-MS/MS) with quantification limits of approximately 1 ng/mL using only 50-μL plasma sample volumes. [21][22][23][24][25] However, some of the problems encountered the latter bioanalytical methods include lack of appropriate stable isotope-labeled AS and DHA internal standards, in addition to expensive solid phase extraction cartridges that most commonly used for extraction of AS and DHA from biological samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%