1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00562807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of amiodarone after intravenous and oral administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
51
0
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Elevated serum concentrations have also been reported in patients treated by amiodarone for cardiac arrhythmias. Andreasen et al (1981) obtained a mean plasma concentration of 1.7,M after daily oral administration of 200 mg, reaching 14.6 pM after an i.v. injection of 400 mg. Mostow et al (1984) reported that serum concentration averaged 6.4 pM during the loading phase of an i.v.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Elevated serum concentrations have also been reported in patients treated by amiodarone for cardiac arrhythmias. Andreasen et al (1981) obtained a mean plasma concentration of 1.7,M after daily oral administration of 200 mg, reaching 14.6 pM after an i.v. injection of 400 mg. Mostow et al (1984) reported that serum concentration averaged 6.4 pM during the loading phase of an i.v.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Binding to normal plasma Classical methods Attempts to measure the protein binding of amiodarone by equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration were not successful, as other workers have found (Andreason et al, 1981;Neyroz & Bonati, 1985). Even after dialysis for 24 h, the radioactivity on the buffer side of the cell was no greater than the background level, while there was a 30% loss of counts from the plasma.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of drug to the ultrafiltration apparatus generally invalidates the use of this method to study protein binding. Andreason et al (1981) were also unsuccessful with a variation of the technique in which plasma was filtered under pressure through a cellophane membrane. Amiodarone is extremely hydrophobic in both the neutral and charged forms (Chatelain & Laruel, 1985), and this is probably why so little crosses dialysis membranes, even when the nominal MW cutoff is for much larger molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 It is incompletely absorbed (35% to 65%) after oral administration. [2][3][4] It is taken up very extensively by tissue, with marked interindividual variation. 5 Estimates of the elimination halflife of amiodarone vary, depending on how it has been measured.…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%