1982
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(82)90072-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of adriamycin in patients with breast cancer: Correlation between pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical short-term response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences may be due to the widely different lipophilicities of the different compounds. A comparison of the cellular pharmacokinetics of ADM (partition coefficient, PC= 0.5) and aclacinomycin A (PC = 21.8) (Zenebergh et al, 1982) (Robert et al, 1982). The relative contributions of these various phases to overall tumour response is not established, although there appeared to be a correlation between tumour response and a parameter related to the early phase of plasma clearance (Robert et al, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These differences may be due to the widely different lipophilicities of the different compounds. A comparison of the cellular pharmacokinetics of ADM (partition coefficient, PC= 0.5) and aclacinomycin A (PC = 21.8) (Zenebergh et al, 1982) (Robert et al, 1982). The relative contributions of these various phases to overall tumour response is not established, although there appeared to be a correlation between tumour response and a parameter related to the early phase of plasma clearance (Robert et al, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the cellular pharmacokinetics of ADM (partition coefficient, PC= 0.5) and aclacinomycin A (PC = 21.8) (Zenebergh et al, 1982) (Robert et al, 1982). The relative contributions of these various phases to overall tumour response is not established, although there appeared to be a correlation between tumour response and a parameter related to the early phase of plasma clearance (Robert et al, 1982). Recent in vitro concentration x time studies using NCI-H69 cells (Twentyman & Fox, in preparation) (Giavazzi et al, 1983) and similar conclusions were reached by Schabel et al (1983) using an ADM-resistant subline of P388 leukaemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doxorubicin concentrations are known to decay in a tri-exponential manner following intravenous (IV) bolus or infusion and typical parameters are available in the literature (e.g. [29], in which doxorubicin is administered as an IV bolus, not infusion).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first PK profile considered here is based on the data provided by Robert et al [29], in which C v (t) is assumed to decay as a tri-exponential (see also [8]), i.e.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the effects of this drug on our cells, we treated MCF7 cells with increasing concentrations of doxorubicin for 24 hr, followed by a drug-free incubation period of 48 hr. Following an intravenous bolus administration of doxorubicin, plasma levels of 1 M are achieved within the first few hours, 35,40 while plasma concentrations of doxorubicin of up to 50 nM are maintained for up to 24 hr. 41,42 Though doxorubicin has a variety of antitumor effects, it did not induce significant amount of apoptosis in MCF7 cells (p ϭ 0.057; Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Clinically Relevant Concentrations Of Doxorubicin mentioning
confidence: 99%