1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02353480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of azosemide after intravenous and oral administration to rats: Absorption from various GI segments

Abstract: Azosemide, 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg, was administered both intravenously and orally to determine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of azosemide in rats (n = 7-12). The absorption of azosemide from various segments of GI tract and the reasons for the appearance of multiple peaks in plasma concentrations of azosemide after oral administration were also investigated. After intravenous (iv) dose, the pharmacokinetic parameters of azosemide such as t1/2. MRT, VSS, CL, CLR, and CLNR were found to be dose-depe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

7
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that azosemide is actively secreted in both groups of rats. Active renal secretion of azosemide was also found in other rat studies (Lee and Lee, 1996). Considering the CL R of azosemide (Table 3) and reported kidney blood flow in rats (36.8 ml/min/kg) (Davies and Morris, 1993) and hematocrit (Table 1), the estimated renal extraction ratios (CL R / renal plasma flow) of azosemide were 3.63 and 36.7% for control rats and NARs, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This indicates that azosemide is actively secreted in both groups of rats. Active renal secretion of azosemide was also found in other rat studies (Lee and Lee, 1996). Considering the CL R of azosemide (Table 3) and reported kidney blood flow in rats (36.8 ml/min/kg) (Davies and Morris, 1993) and hematocrit (Table 1), the estimated renal extraction ratios (CL R / renal plasma flow) of azosemide were 3.63 and 36.7% for control rats and NARs, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The V ss was significantly larger in NARs (Table 3), which could be due to higher concentrations of tissue globulins in NARs (Renkin et al, 1993) and 6.3-fold increase in free fraction of azosemide in plasma (Table 1). The larger V ss of azosemide due to increased free fraction in plasma has also been reported in Sprague-Dawley rats (Lee and Lee, 1996). The V ss of furosemide was also significantly greater in NARs than that in control rats (Inoue et al, 1987).…”
Section: Fig 3 Arterial Plasma Concentration-time Profiles Of Azosesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The procedures used to determine biliary excretion were similar to those reported previously (25). In the early morning, the jugular vein and the bile duct of each rat were cannulated with polyethylene tubing (Clay Adams, Parsippany, N.J.) while each rat was lightly anesthetized with ether.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard methods [10] were used to calculate the following pharmacokinetic parameters after intravenous administration; the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time infinity (AUC) [11], time-averaged total body clearance (Cl), area under the first moment of plasma concentration-time curve (AUMC), mean residence time (MRT), apparent volume of distribution at steady-state (V ss ), and the time-averaged renal (Cl r ) and nonrenal (Cl nr ) clearances [12,13].…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%