1992
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199209001-00331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics and Dynamics of Ketamine Enantiomers Using a Stereoselective Analytical Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
2
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
43
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In vivo studies in humans have shown higher values for the clearance of S-ket than for R-ket either after administration of the individual enantiomers (Persson et al, 2002;White et al, 1985) or after administration of the racemic mixture (Henthorn et al, 1999;Geisslinger et al, 1993;Ihmsen et al, 2001). Our results also clearly show differences in biotransformation of ketamine and/or norketamine enantiomers resulting in consistently higher plasma concentrations of S-nor than of R-nor.…”
Section: Discussion Pharmacokineticssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In vivo studies in humans have shown higher values for the clearance of S-ket than for R-ket either after administration of the individual enantiomers (Persson et al, 2002;White et al, 1985) or after administration of the racemic mixture (Henthorn et al, 1999;Geisslinger et al, 1993;Ihmsen et al, 2001). Our results also clearly show differences in biotransformation of ketamine and/or norketamine enantiomers resulting in consistently higher plasma concentrations of S-nor than of R-nor.…”
Section: Discussion Pharmacokineticssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The authors proposed two possible reasons: concentration-dependent N-demethylation and concentration-independent metabolic inversion from R-to S-nor or from R-to S-ket and subsequent metabolism to S-nor. We consider the second suggestion to be rather unlikely because no R-enantiomers were detected after administration of S-ket (Geisslinger et al, 1993;Ihmsen et al, 2001). …”
Section: Discussion Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ketamine has been used extensively as an anesthetic agent and the plasma concentrations associated with subanesthetic psychosislike perceptual disturbances are in the range of 0.5-1 M, 28 and with anesthesia setting in at concentrations in the 10-100 M range. [29][30][31] Further, brain concentrations are known to be several fold higher than plasma concentrations, 32 suggesting that even the subanesthetic psychosis-like perceptual disturbances occur only at brain concentrations in the one to few micromolar range. Since the affinities of ketamine for the NMDA receptors as well as for the dopamine D 2 and serotonin 5-HT 2 are relevant in this M range, this would make a selective disruption of NMDA transmission by these agents unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anesthetic potency of the S(+)-isomer is approximately three or four times that of the R(-)-isomer [1] . In vivo, there is a statistically significant (P<0.01) smaller clearance and volume of distribution for R(-)-ketamine compared with S(+)-ketamine [2] . Several animal studies have shown that the clearance and volume of distribution of ketamine are related to hepatic blood flow, which can be predicted in humans [3] .…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics (Pk) and Pharmacodynamics (Pd)mentioning
confidence: 91%