2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2012.01428.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence in the pig of two ivermectin feed formulations

Abstract: Two premix products containing the endectocide ivermectin were compared for pharmacokinetic profiles and bioequivalence in young pigs. Test and reference articles were administered to individual pigs in-feed at 12-h intervals for a total of 14 doses. Plasma concentration-time profiles were compared after provision of the final doses of medicated feed, by which time steady-state concentrations of ivermectin had been achieved. The pharmacokinetic variables monitored were peak concentration (Cmax ), area under th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 0.2 mg/kg oral tablet administration, IVM plasma concentration levels were in agreement with those previously published for piglets. 25,26 IVM was well absorbed and extensively distributed, resulting in higher concentrations in lung tissue than in plasma (see Fig. 2), a pattern already observed in cattle subcutaneously treated with IVM, 17 and confirmed by a recent pharmacokinetic simulation report looking at IVM lung exposure in humans.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…After 0.2 mg/kg oral tablet administration, IVM plasma concentration levels were in agreement with those previously published for piglets. 25,26 IVM was well absorbed and extensively distributed, resulting in higher concentrations in lung tissue than in plasma (see Fig. 2), a pattern already observed in cattle subcutaneously treated with IVM, 17 and confirmed by a recent pharmacokinetic simulation report looking at IVM lung exposure in humans.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%