1996
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetically guided dosing of carboplatin and etoposide during peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Quite contrary to cisplatin, the dialysability of etoposide was low in this study, while clearance of the agent in the haemodialysis patients was as efficient as that in patients with normal renal function. Although this observation is similar to previously published data (Holthuis et al, 1985;Sauer et al, 1990;Stewart, 1994), it seems at variance with the excretion routes of this drug in patients with normal renal function, where it is reportedly normally eliminated by renal (60%) and hepatic (40%) mechanisms (English et al, 1996). Our observation could be explained by the assumption that the hepatobiliary route completely compensates for the renal route in haemodialysis patients, but our study did not present any evidence to support this hypothesis.…”
contrasting
confidence: 34%
“…Quite contrary to cisplatin, the dialysability of etoposide was low in this study, while clearance of the agent in the haemodialysis patients was as efficient as that in patients with normal renal function. Although this observation is similar to previously published data (Holthuis et al, 1985;Sauer et al, 1990;Stewart, 1994), it seems at variance with the excretion routes of this drug in patients with normal renal function, where it is reportedly normally eliminated by renal (60%) and hepatic (40%) mechanisms (English et al, 1996). Our observation could be explained by the assumption that the hepatobiliary route completely compensates for the renal route in haemodialysis patients, but our study did not present any evidence to support this hypothesis.…”
contrasting
confidence: 34%
“…Several concerns about this radical approach have been raised. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chemotherapy in anephric children on chronic dialysis have not been well studied, and the risk of infectious complications during chemotherapy in dialyzed children is increased as compared with patients maintaining renal functioning [16,19]. Therefore, some physicians advocate a more conservative approach in DDS patients with Wilms tumor and delay prophylactic nephrectomy until chemotherapy is completed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It seems likely that the reduced interpatient pharmacokinetic variability seen in this group of patients was due to the fact that only one child had previously received cisplatin, as cisplatin therapy has previously been shown to predict for reduced etoposide clearance (Pfluger et al, 1987(Pfluger et al, , 1993Relling et al, 1994 Previous studies involving targeted dosing with etoposide using limited sampling methods have involved the administration of etoposide as a continuous infusion over 3 or 5 days (Ratain et al, 1989(Ratain et al, , 1991Joel et al, 1996). In addition, English et al (1996) reported two anephric paediatric patients in whom targeted dosing with both etoposide and carboplatin was possible using detailed pharmacokinetic sampling over three doses. In this latter study, etoposide exposure was within 14% of the target in all four courses studied, despite etoposide plasma clearances varying between 14 and 23 ml min-' m-'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%