2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic variability, efficacy and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate–A national approach to the evaluation of therapeutic drug monitoring data and clinical outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
13
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, neither efficacy nor tolerability appeared to be different in the two groups, although there was a slight predominance of more responders and less recorded adverse effects in the ID group, which conceivably had an impact on the retention rate. As compared to other recently approved AEDs, we previously demonstrated a retention rate of 83%, 72%, and 63% of eslicarbazepine acetate in patients with refractory epilepsy after 1, 2, and 3 years of treatment, respectively . In another study with patients with refractory epilepsy and ID, the retention rate of perampanel was 46% and 42%, after 1 and 2 years, respectively …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, neither efficacy nor tolerability appeared to be different in the two groups, although there was a slight predominance of more responders and less recorded adverse effects in the ID group, which conceivably had an impact on the retention rate. As compared to other recently approved AEDs, we previously demonstrated a retention rate of 83%, 72%, and 63% of eslicarbazepine acetate in patients with refractory epilepsy after 1, 2, and 3 years of treatment, respectively . In another study with patients with refractory epilepsy and ID, the retention rate of perampanel was 46% and 42%, after 1 and 2 years, respectively …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Our findings indicate that serum concentrations of LCM below 10 µmol/L (ie, the lower limit of the reference range) result in poor efficacy. Some of these patients with low concentrations seemed to have relevant therapeutic daily dosages above 200 mg, which underlines the importance of using TDM when experiencing lack of efficacy . Concomitantly used AEDs contributed only moderately to variability between patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations