2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1960-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic Tools and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Pred‐hERG app, used specifically for cardiotoxicity analysis, played a critical role given the significant importance of cardiac safety in drug development 34 . The pkCSM tool, which was used in the evaluation of a variety of properties such as water solubility (log mol/L), Caco 2 permeability (Log Papp in 10), absorption in human intestine (HIA) (% absorbed), provided indispensable insights into the solubility, permeability and potential hepatotoxicity of the ligands, which are critical for the evaluation of their drug and toxicity profiles 35–37 . The vNN‐ADMET tool was used for a comprehensive toxicity assessment that included human liver microsomal (HLM) stability, cardiotoxicity, cytotoxicity, MMP (mitochondrial toxicity), and Ames toxicity/mutagenesis, and contributed significantly to characterize the safety profile of the ligands 38,39 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Pred‐hERG app, used specifically for cardiotoxicity analysis, played a critical role given the significant importance of cardiac safety in drug development 34 . The pkCSM tool, which was used in the evaluation of a variety of properties such as water solubility (log mol/L), Caco 2 permeability (Log Papp in 10), absorption in human intestine (HIA) (% absorbed), provided indispensable insights into the solubility, permeability and potential hepatotoxicity of the ligands, which are critical for the evaluation of their drug and toxicity profiles 35–37 . The vNN‐ADMET tool was used for a comprehensive toxicity assessment that included human liver microsomal (HLM) stability, cardiotoxicity, cytotoxicity, MMP (mitochondrial toxicity), and Ames toxicity/mutagenesis, and contributed significantly to characterize the safety profile of the ligands 38,39 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 34 The pkCSM tool, which was used in the evaluation of a variety of properties such as water solubility (log mol/L), Caco 2 permeability (Log Papp in 10), absorption in human intestine (HIA) (% absorbed), provided indispensable insights into the solubility, permeability and potential hepatotoxicity of the ligands, which are critical for the evaluation of their drug and toxicity profiles. 35 , 36 , 37 The vNN‐ADMET tool was used for a comprehensive toxicity assessment that included human liver microsomal (HLM) stability, cardiotoxicity, cytotoxicity, MMP (mitochondrial toxicity), and Ames toxicity/mutagenesis, and contributed significantly to characterize the safety profile of the ligands. 38 , 39 Finally, the PreADMET tool was used for its capabilities in MDCK permeability analysis and carcinogenicity assessment along with Salmonella strain mutagenicity assessment, which was essential for assessing the potential genotoxic and carcinogenic risks of the ligands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pharmacokinetic properties, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, are critical for determining the optimal dose of compounds and the frequency of administration as well as for ensuring drug adherence, and all of these play an important role in clinical application [170]. After rat oral administration, tectorigenin can be directly absorbed from the intestinal tract by passive diffusion, and it then undergoes glucuronidation and/or sulfation metabolic pathways by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) and sulfotransferases to form corresponding metabolites [171].…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics Of Tectorigeninmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, QSAR models have only local validity, and the low structural similarity between the compounds in the validation and training sets can result in poor predictive performance. 10 Another drawback of the QSAR models is that, usually, they do not consider pharmacokinetic (PK) information, such as the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties of compounds, 11 and they might have difficulties in characterizing the actual chemical risk of a compound since the toxicity of a compound is linked to the exposure. 12 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%