Rationale:In developing an alternative formulation of formoterol fumarate (FF), systemic exposure from the new product must be similar to an approved formulation and maintain a similar pharmacodynamic (PD) response. In order to evaluate dose-response, and assure assay sensitivity, doses higher than the approved product should be administered to demonstrate superior PD response relative to the approved dose. Pearl has previously demonstrated bioequivalence between FF-MDI and Foradil® Aerolizer® (Foradil). Pearl conducted a single dose crossover study to compare FF-MDI to Foradil at the approved and higher doses. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, six period, crossover study conducted in patients with moderate to severe COPD that were reversible to albuterol, 3 doses of FF-MDI (7.2, 9.6 and 19.2µg) were compared to placebo MDI, and Foradil (12 and 24 µg). Pharmacokinetic (PK) and PD assessments were conducted for 12 hours following each dose. The primary efficacy endpoint was FEV AUC relative to pre-dose 1 0-12 baseline at the start of each treatment day. Secondary endpoints included Peak FEV , morning trough FEV and safety assessments. Full 1 1 PK profiles were obtained throughout the 12â€'hour observation period. An ANOVA was used in the analyses of the ln-transformed PK parameters AUC , and C . The resulting mean estimates (Geometric Least-Squares Means, Geometric LSM) for each treatment were 0-12 max computed. Results: Fifty patients were randomized. All doses of FF-MDI and Foradil were superior to placebo for the primary endpoint (P<0.0001 for all comparisons). FF-MDI 7.2 µg and FF-MDI 9.6 µg were non-inferior to Foradil 12 µg. Foradil 24 µg was superior to Foradil 12 µg (mean difference = 52 mL) and FF-MDI 19.2 µg was superior to FF-MDI 9.6 µg (mean difference = 42 mL), demonstrating assay sensitivity across both formulations. Bioequivalence between FF-MDI 9.6 µg and Foradil 12 µg was demonstrated by the ratio of Geometric LSMs and 90% CI for AUC (0.98, 0.90-1.07, respectively), and for Cmax (0.96, 0.87-1.07, respectively). Similar PK results were observed for the 0-12 comparison between FF-MDI 19.2 µg and Foradil 24 µg. All products were safe and well tolerated with no substantial differences across formulations. Conclusion: This is the second study in which Pearl Therapeutics' formulation of FF-MDI 9.6 µg demonstrated bioequivalence and comparable efficacy and safety to Foradil® Aerolizer® 12 µg. In this study, assay sensitivity was achieved with comparable findings across the two higher doses.