2017
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for unfractionated heparin dosing during cardiopulmonary bypass

Abstract: A population PK/PD analysis of heparin during CPB, using a routine haemostatic test, shows that Bayesian estimation might help to predict ACT on the basis of only one or two blood samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prolonged ER stress induced by pressure overload was accompanied by the increased expression of GRP78 and CHOP [26, 27]. Moreover, GRP78 was up-regulated under stressful conditions of low oxygen and low calcium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prolonged ER stress induced by pressure overload was accompanied by the increased expression of GRP78 and CHOP [26, 27]. Moreover, GRP78 was up-regulated under stressful conditions of low oxygen and low calcium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delavenne and colleagues 89 showed that a PK/pharmacodynamic model can be used for monitoring of the anticoagulation effect and calculation of an adequate protamine dose after CPB using the inhibitory effects of heparin on FXa as validation method. 89 Jia and colleagues 90 developed a two-compartment PK model based on antithrombin (FIIa) concentrations to predict heparin concentrations during hypothermic cardiac surgery. In particular, the level of thrombin inhibition by the heparin/anti-thrombin complex was used as an index to estimate plasma heparin concentrations.…”
Section: Model-based Titration Of Protaminementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effect of bolus administration of unfractionated heparin is variable, and it can be influenced by body mass and concurrent thrombolytic drug administration (26,27). UFH was used intra-operatively in this case for thromboprophylaxis to achieve a target ACT of 250-350 s (28,29). The prolonged duration of inhibition of coagulation in this case, apparent in the time it took the ACT to normalize, was unexpected, even when the variable effect of heparin on coagulation is considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%