2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00342-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic parameters and radiomics model based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for the preoperative prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

Abstract: Background To establish pharmacokinetic parameters and a radiomics model based on dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for predicting sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Methods A total of 164 breast cancer patients confirmed by pathology were prospectively enrolled from December 2017 to May 2018, and underwent DCE-MRI before surgery. Pharmacokinetic parameters and radiomics features were derived from DCE-MRI data. Least absolute shrinkage and select… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(35 reference statements)
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, in our study, for intratumoral radiomic feature from post-contrast phase, first-order features (Variance, Quantile5, MeanDeviation) were mainly selected to predict negative SLN, which also implied the tumor heterogeneity. Moreover, the selected features from whole tumor in our study also included pharmacokinetic parameters (BF_10percent, TTP_25percent, TTP_Max, MTT_Max, MAXSlope_Area) after histogram analysis, which is consistent with a previous study (31), suggesting that massive angiogenesis in tumor may contribute to the perfusion change.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, in our study, for intratumoral radiomic feature from post-contrast phase, first-order features (Variance, Quantile5, MeanDeviation) were mainly selected to predict negative SLN, which also implied the tumor heterogeneity. Moreover, the selected features from whole tumor in our study also included pharmacokinetic parameters (BF_10percent, TTP_25percent, TTP_Max, MTT_Max, MAXSlope_Area) after histogram analysis, which is consistent with a previous study (31), suggesting that massive angiogenesis in tumor may contribute to the perfusion change.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As an emerging tool for medical application in recent years, radiomics provides a large number of quantitative features derived from post-contrast images based on DCE-MRI. Liu et al combined pharmacokinetic parameters and radiomic features of maximum layer in primary tumor to predict SLN status and obtained a satisfactory performance (AUC 0.80) (31). Pharmacokinetic parameters can also be further analyzed by histogram, one kind of radiomics analysis, which has the potential to be a noninvasive biomarker for preoperative differentiation of molecular subtypes (32), lymph node metastasis (33), and proliferative activities (34) of breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What emerges, and which is important to underline to a public of biomedical data scientists or clinician with a transactional interest field, is that the maximum informative power contained in the only characteristics considered for the prediction of the sentinel lymph node status does not exceed 62-63% on the independent test. For this reason, encouraged by recent studies with improved results in the prediction of the lymph node metastasis probability thanks to the joint use of histopathologic and radiomic features [6,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], in our future works we will also involve radiomic features extracted from first-level radiological examinations, such as ultrasound and mammography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the AUC was improved from 0.799 to 0.839 for the radiomics model combining tumor with FGT after further involving the clinical factor of PR, which was consistent with a previous study (16). However, different studies obtained different AUCs of predictive models based on radiomic features from intratumoral and peritumoral regions and clinical factors (16,17,31,35). One of the possible reasons is that we predict negative SLN instead of positive SLN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%