2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.2c00054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic Optimization of Small Molecule Janus Kinase 3 Inhibitors to Target Immune Cells

Abstract: Modulation of Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling is a promising method of treating autoimmune diseases, and the profound potency of clinical compounds makes this mode of action particularly attractive. Other questions that remain unanswered also include: What is the ideal selectivity between JAK1 and JAK3? Which cells are most relevant to JAK blockade? And what is the ideal tissue distribution pattern for addressing specific autoimmune conditions? We hypothesized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 is an example of the macrolide conjugate class with promising in vitro efficacy coupled with appropriate in vivo pharmacokinetics (oral availability and extended tissue half-life). 25 Oral In subsequent studies, 3 was replaced by 4, a similar conjugate compound with improved in vitro potency and pharmacokinetics (see Supporting Information, Figure S5 and Table S1). The other test compounds, 1 and 2, were selected based on pharmacokinetic properties: 1 has adequate JAK3 potency and distributes well into tissues including the CNS.…”
Section: Jak3 Inhibitors Differentially Affect the Cytokine Response ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 is an example of the macrolide conjugate class with promising in vitro efficacy coupled with appropriate in vivo pharmacokinetics (oral availability and extended tissue half-life). 25 Oral In subsequent studies, 3 was replaced by 4, a similar conjugate compound with improved in vitro potency and pharmacokinetics (see Supporting Information, Figure S5 and Table S1). The other test compounds, 1 and 2, were selected based on pharmacokinetic properties: 1 has adequate JAK3 potency and distributes well into tissues including the CNS.…”
Section: Jak3 Inhibitors Differentially Affect the Cytokine Response ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 We recently reported the synthesis and characterization of a series of JAK3 inhibitors based on its scaffold (Figures 3 and 4). 25 1−4 are structurally related analogues of 8. Their inhibitory potencies for JAK3 are within the same order of magnitude as 8 or slightly lower (see Supporting Information, Table S1), while possessing different pharmacokinetic profiles and in vivo stabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the highly conserved structural features of the ATP binding pocket, it has been challenging to achieve high selectivity among the JAK family. Many recent developments of JAK3 inhibitors have been focused on a JAK3 unique cysteine residue (CYS909) by forming a covalent bond with JAK3 inhibitors [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. The idea of developing an inhibitor that can covalently bind to cysteine 909 was from other covalent drugs such as afatinib, osimertinib, and ibrutinib ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three drugs in Figure 2 shared a common α,β-unsaturated amide moiety to allow the Michael addition to the target protein via covalent binding. A number of JAK3 covalently bound inhibitors have been reported and some have been studied under various stages of clinical trials [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, protein kinases are grouped, depending on their amino acid residue they phosphorylate -as serine/ threonine kinases, tyrosine kinases or dual-specificity kinases. The total number of protein kinases included in the kinome is still under debate, since some kinases phosphorylate non-protein substrates or are so called atypical kinases 7 . The subgroups defined by Manning et al are defined as such: AGC family containing PKA, PKG and PKC, calcium/ calmodulin dependent kinase (CAMK), casein kinase1 (CK1), a group of cyclin dependent kinases, MAP kinases, glycogen synthase kinase and casein kinases (CMGC), sterile 20-like kinases (STE), tyrosine kinases (TK) and tyrosine kinase like (TKL), and others 6 .…”
Section: Zusammenfassung (Germanmentioning
confidence: 99%