2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles of Anti-infective Dosing

Abstract: Purpose An understanding of the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) principles that determine response to antimicrobial therapy can provide the clinician with better-informed dosing regimens. Factors influential on antibiotic disposition and clinical outcome are presented, with a focus on the primary site of infection. Techniques to better understand antibiotic PK and optimize PD are acknowledged. Methods PubMed (inception – April 2016) was reviewed for relevant publications assessing antimicrobial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
0
12

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 198 publications
1
104
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is supported by other publications reporting that bolus administration of polyamines significantly attenuates injury or promotes regeneration [6, 7, 9, 10]. Additionally, it is also supported by pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics theory in pharmacy, which describes the time course of effect intensity in response to administration of an antibiotics dose [17]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This finding is supported by other publications reporting that bolus administration of polyamines significantly attenuates injury or promotes regeneration [6, 7, 9, 10]. Additionally, it is also supported by pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics theory in pharmacy, which describes the time course of effect intensity in response to administration of an antibiotics dose [17]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Establishing PK/PD targets for NP and VAP Population PK modeling and PTA analyses using PK/PD targets derived from preclinical data are commonly used to guide and support the selection of appropriate antibiotic dosage regimens for clinical use [40][41][42][43]. Achievement of 50% free drug time above the MIC (fT>MIC) is an established PD target for ceftazidime that is associated with up to 2 log 10 killing of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa in neutropenic mouse infection models [44][45][46], and with microbiological eradication in patients with NP caused by Gram-negative pathogens [47,48].…”
Section: Ceftazidime-avibactam: Development Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pneumonia caused by extracellular pathogens, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) has been used as the target site to determine adequacy of drug exposure. Currently, the literature on ELF‐to‐plasma ratios is limited to a small number of antibiotics, all of which were evaluated in adults, and comprises beta‐lactams (ranging from 0.21 to 1.04, depending on the specific beta‐lactam), vancomycin (0.18 to 0.50), aminoglycosides (highly variable hysteresis depending on sampling time and arising from the hydrophilic property of these antibiotics), and fluoroquinolones (>1.0, which represents extensive lung penetration) . The presence of hysteresis on a concentration‐effect plot implies a delay in time between measured concentration and response, as well as an associated lower peak concentration.…”
Section: Pharmacodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the literature on ELF-to-plasma ratios is limited to a small number of antibiotics, all of which were evaluated in adults, and comprises beta-lactams (ranging from 0.21 to 1.04, depending on the specific beta-lactam), vancomycin (0.18 to 0.50), aminoglycosides (highly variable hysteresis depending on sampling time and arising from the hydrophilic property of these antibiotics), and fluoroquinolones (>1.0, which represents extensive lung penetration). 30 The presence of hysteresis on a concentration-effect plot implies a delay in time between measured concentration and response, as well as an associated lower peak concentration. Notably, these studies of ELF do not account for redistribution of drugs from the ELF back to plasma because only specific time points after dose administration (rather than over the entire dosing interval) were evaluated.…”
Section: Pharmacodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%