2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4227-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacogenetics in type 2 diabetes: precision medicine or discovery tool?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Having established that searching for genetic determinants of metformin response is sensible, it becomes worthwhile to articulate the main goals of pharmacogenetic inquiry (see Text box) [24]. One goal is to use genetic variation to stratify patients into likely responders and non-responders, so as to tailor therapy to those most likely to benefit.…”
Section: The Genetic Approach As a Potential Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having established that searching for genetic determinants of metformin response is sensible, it becomes worthwhile to articulate the main goals of pharmacogenetic inquiry (see Text box) [24]. One goal is to use genetic variation to stratify patients into likely responders and non-responders, so as to tailor therapy to those most likely to benefit.…”
Section: The Genetic Approach As a Potential Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strongest association (odds of achieving the glycaemic target, 1.6) was detected at SNP rs11212617; this signal was followed up in an independent set of 1783 GoDARTS and 1113 UKPDS participants, achieving genome-wide statistical significance. Other groups have reproduced this finding in participants with established type 2 diabetes [51]; however, the DPP has not been able to detect an association of this SNP with diabetes incidence or change in quantitative glycaemic traits in participants with impaired glucose tolerance [52], a failure that may be caused by insufficient statistical power or the intriguing possibility that pharmacogenetic interactions may diverge at different stages of the disease process [24]. …”
Section: Second Phase: Gwasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial candidate gene approaches focused on SLC22A1 (encoding the organic cation transporter 1) or SLC47A1 (encoding the multidrug and toxin extrusion 1) have failed to produce a definite picture of the genetic determinants of metformin response. 108 GWASs have identified two metformin response loci (ATM and SLC2A2). The ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) locus, located in a large linkage disequilibrium block on chromosome 11 that includes a total of seven potential candidate genes, has been associated with glycemic response to metformin.…”
Section: Does Omic Information Make a Difference For Treatment?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining subgroups using molecular testing is much more difficult in T2DM, as it is a polygenic disorder and the clinical phenotype reflects environmental as well as genetic influences [11]. One approach for precision medicine in T2DM is to categorise patients based on differential responses to drugs, and to then investigate the molecular underpinnings of each subgroup using next-generation sequencing platforms and gene arrays.…”
Section: Precision Diabetes In T2dmmentioning
confidence: 99%