2014
DOI: 10.1586/17512433.2014.966811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacogenetics and immunosuppressive drugs

Abstract: Several candidate genes have been proposed as potential biomarkers for altered pharmacodynamics or pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs. However, there is usually only limited clinical evidence substantiating the implementation of biomarkers into clinical practice. Testing for thiopurine-S-methyltransferase polymorphisms has been put into routine clinical use quite widely, while the other pharmacogenetic tests are much less frequently used. Relatively good evidence appeared for tacrolimus-related biomar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tacrolimus, cyclosporine, everolimus). Most of these studies have been retrospective in design and the most relevant associations correspond to variants in CYP3A5 and ABCB1 [28,29], [30,31], however, most studies of everolimus pharmacokinetics have given negative results[32,33,34,35]. In this study, we found that CYP3A4*22 resulted in significantly higher plasma levels of everolimus, consistent with the decreased activity caused by the CYP3A4*22 allele [21], while no effect was detected for CYP3A5*3 with the same number of carrier patients This suggests a greater influence of CYP3A4*22 than CYP3A5*3 in everolimus pharmacokinetics, at least in MBC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tacrolimus, cyclosporine, everolimus). Most of these studies have been retrospective in design and the most relevant associations correspond to variants in CYP3A5 and ABCB1 [28,29], [30,31], however, most studies of everolimus pharmacokinetics have given negative results[32,33,34,35]. In this study, we found that CYP3A4*22 resulted in significantly higher plasma levels of everolimus, consistent with the decreased activity caused by the CYP3A4*22 allele [21], while no effect was detected for CYP3A5*3 with the same number of carrier patients This suggests a greater influence of CYP3A4*22 than CYP3A5*3 in everolimus pharmacokinetics, at least in MBC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several factors influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus, including hepatic dysfunction, post-transplantation time, hematocrit, serum albumin, age, race and drug interactions, especially gene polymorphism [ 5 ]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in cytochrome P450 3A ( CYP3A ) play an important role in tacrolimus metabolism [ 6 ]. CYP3A enzymes in human liver microsomes play a major role in the oxidation of tacrolimus[ 7 ], and the tacrolimus metabolism within the small intestinal contributes significantly to its bioavailability[ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1315,27,28 While there have been great advances in methylation-dependent bioinformatics and disease-associated biomarkers, 2931 the study of intracellular MT spatial/temporal resolution, specificity, and/or function remains a challenge. 9,14,15,2528,3236 Toward this end, the pioneering demonstration of AdoMet analogs, bearing alternative alkyl donor substituents, as cosubstrates for DNA 37 or natural product (NP) 38 MTs has inspired new tools and strategies to study NP, 3942 protein, 4351 and nucleic acid 6,5257 methylation where the recent development of enzyme-based strategies for the synthesis of differentially alkylated AdoMet analogs has simplified access to these unique cosubstrates. 42,49,50,5759 However, the stability of AdoMet or its corresponding differentially alkylated analogs under physiological conditions limits their utility as reagents or therapeutics by virtue of two fundamental degradative processes: intramolecular cyclization to homoserine lactone and 5′-deoxy-5′-(alkylthio)adenosine (Figure 1, pathway a) and depurination (Figure 1, pathway b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%