2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1608-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacogenetic studies of alcohol self-administration and withdrawal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4A). Separation between the genotypes was most pronounced at the two highest alcohol concentrations at which consumption motivated by pharmacological alcohol effects is known to dominate over intake for taste, calories, or other nonpharmacological effects (25). Preference for alcohol was also differentially affected (Fig.…”
Section: Alcohol Consumption and Preference Are Elevated In Mglur2 Nullmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…4A). Separation between the genotypes was most pronounced at the two highest alcohol concentrations at which consumption motivated by pharmacological alcohol effects is known to dominate over intake for taste, calories, or other nonpharmacological effects (25). Preference for alcohol was also differentially affected (Fig.…”
Section: Alcohol Consumption and Preference Are Elevated In Mglur2 Nullmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…C57BL/6J mice have a genetically determined high preference for ethanol-containing solutions (Bachmanov et al, 2002;Crabbe and Phillips, 2004) in nonoperant (Bachmanov et al, 2000;Belknap et al, 1993;McClearn and Rodgers, 1959;Rhodes et al, 2007;Yoneyama et al, 2008) and operant oral self-administration procedures (Elmer et al, 1988;Risinger et al, 1998). In this strain of mice, nonsweetened alcoholic solutions offered in operant procedures have marked reinforcing properties in long sessions (lasting 16 to 23 h) (Besheer et al, 2004Hodge et al, 2006;Risinger et al, 1998Risinger et al, , 2001Schroeder et al, 2003) and in foodrestricted mice (Elmer et al, 1986(Elmer et al, , 1988Middaugh et al, 1999;Hayward et al, 2004;Heidbreder et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Animal models have been employed to examine the underlying neural mechanisms which may mediate alcohol dependence (Kaun et al, 2011; Spanagel, 2003). Laboratory animal species such as the mouse, rat, and fruit fly have been used to model alcohol-dependent behaviours such as conditioned place preference and alcohol-induced withdrawal symptoms (Spanagel, 2010; Crabbe & Phillips, 2004; Crabbe et al, 2010; Kaun et al, 2011). Two neuroplastic changes that are commonly examined following long-term alcohol use are the development of tolerance and sensitization (reverse tolerance) (Hyman & Malenka, 2001; Spanagel, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%