2021
DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2021.11.201206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacoepidemiological research of COVID-19 in the Russian Federation EGIDA-2020

Abstract: Aim. An analysis of coronavirus infection in Russia and evaluation of different AVT regimens effectiveness. Materials and methods. The study involved a retrospective analysis of 1082 patient records with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in 17 regions of Russia. The number of men and women was equal, mean age 48.718.1 (median 50). Patients with moderate COVID-19 (85%) versus mild COVID-19 (15%) were characterized by higher age (median 54 vs 21 years; p0.001), higher body mass index (27.8 vs 23.4; p0.001),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prescribing in ICUs was heterogeneous but overall consistently high across healthcare settings (75.6% on average, variations from 52.7% to 100%), while in medical wards, antibiotics were given less commonly (29.7% on average, variations from 19% to 62%). These rates are lower in comparison with the global data (60–100% [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]) and the data from the Russian EGIDA-2020 study [ 11 ] that revealed 77% antibiotic coverage in COVID-19 inpatients in 2020, which can be explained by the methodological differences of the studies as well as the global trend to restrict antibacterial prescribing in COVID-19 patients. By now, it is a well-known fact that bacterial infections are relatively rare in patients with COVID-19 outside of intensive care [ 9 , 10 ], which makes antibacterial therapy unjustified in certain portion of patients and provides an opportunity for AMS interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Prescribing in ICUs was heterogeneous but overall consistently high across healthcare settings (75.6% on average, variations from 52.7% to 100%), while in medical wards, antibiotics were given less commonly (29.7% on average, variations from 19% to 62%). These rates are lower in comparison with the global data (60–100% [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]) and the data from the Russian EGIDA-2020 study [ 11 ] that revealed 77% antibiotic coverage in COVID-19 inpatients in 2020, which can be explained by the methodological differences of the studies as well as the global trend to restrict antibacterial prescribing in COVID-19 patients. By now, it is a well-known fact that bacterial infections are relatively rare in patients with COVID-19 outside of intensive care [ 9 , 10 ], which makes antibacterial therapy unjustified in certain portion of patients and provides an opportunity for AMS interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The rate of patients who received antiviral therapy on the day of the PPS (31%) was vastly different from the 92% observed in the retrospective EGIDA-2020 study of 1082 records of patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in 17 regions of Russia [ 11 ]. This gap can be partially explained by different methodologies of the projects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations