2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00058-2.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacodynamics of doxycycline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
73
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether the higher level of doxycycline in vitro susceptibility is reflected clinically depends on additional PK/PD drug properties. The in vitro antibacterial activity of both doxycycline and tetracycline against S. pseudintermedius is time dependent, which is in agreement with previous findings for Staphylococcus aureus (40). According to the definition by LaPlante et al (24), in which a Ͻ3-log 10 CFU/ml reduction in colony count from that of the initial inoculum defines bacteriostatic activity, while a Ն3-log 10 CFU/ml reduction in colony count from that of the initial inoculum defines bactericidal activity, the activities of both drugs against S. pseudintermedius were regarded as bacteriostatic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Whether the higher level of doxycycline in vitro susceptibility is reflected clinically depends on additional PK/PD drug properties. The in vitro antibacterial activity of both doxycycline and tetracycline against S. pseudintermedius is time dependent, which is in agreement with previous findings for Staphylococcus aureus (40). According to the definition by LaPlante et al (24), in which a Ͻ3-log 10 CFU/ml reduction in colony count from that of the initial inoculum defines bacteriostatic activity, while a Ն3-log 10 CFU/ml reduction in colony count from that of the initial inoculum defines bactericidal activity, the activities of both drugs against S. pseudintermedius were regarded as bacteriostatic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present study, the C ss (8.3 ± 0.9 μg/mL) was above most inhibitory concentrations required for DC to exert a bacteriostatic effect against Staphylococcus aureus (4.8 μg/mL), Streptococcus pneumoniae (1.6 μg/mL), Pasteurella multocida (1.6 μg/mL), and Escherichia coli (8 μg/mL) (Cunha et al, 2000). This C ss was also 42 times higher than the MIC 90 for Mycoplasma gallisepticum (0.125 μg/mL) (Burch and Valks, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The analysis presented here is the first to explore a population pharmacokinetic model of doxycycline concentrations following oral administration, which is an important step toward a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model that could be used to critically examine and optimize doxycycline dose regimens. Although in vitro studies indicate that low concentrations of doxycycline kill in a time-dependent kinetic manner while higher concentrations kill in a concentration-dependent kinetic manner (13), at present this area has been insufficiently explored (2). Albeit this study is a step toward this, it is of note that this study presents a population pharmacokinetic model of doxycycline concentrations following the oral administration of doxycycline concentrations in healthy individuals, and the effect of disease status or sickness on doxycycline pharmacokinetics was not investigated here as all participants were healthy volunteers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%