2005
DOI: 10.1128/aac.49.1.302-308.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime Alone and in Combination with Various Antimicrobials against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Infection Model

Abstract: .05-to ؊3.63-log 10 decrease) (P < 0.05). A 99.9% kill was achieved with cefepime plus aminoglycoside combinations as early as 2 h and maintained throughout the 48-h period. TIG was antagonistic when combined with C12 against both isolates. DAP alone achieved 99.9% kill for up to 48 h for both isolates and was the most active agent against R2481 and R2484 (؊2.89-and ؊3.61-log 10 decrease at 48 h); therefore, combination therapy did not enhance lethality. Overall, the most potent combinations noted were cefepim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of CEF and VAN was rapidly bactericidal against MRSA strains in an in vitro one-compartment model, while the combination of CEF plus LIN and CEF plus quinupristindalfopristin showed improvement (Ͻ2-log 10 CFU/ml increase in kill) over the activity of the single agents (3). The combination of CEF plus GEN or tobramycin demonstrated rapid bactericidal activity against two clinical MRSA strains when examined in the same model (15). The addition of CEF to DAP in this study did not show any additional activity, as DAP was rapidly and persistently bactericidal alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The combination of CEF and VAN was rapidly bactericidal against MRSA strains in an in vitro one-compartment model, while the combination of CEF plus LIN and CEF plus quinupristindalfopristin showed improvement (Ͻ2-log 10 CFU/ml increase in kill) over the activity of the single agents (3). The combination of CEF plus GEN or tobramycin demonstrated rapid bactericidal activity against two clinical MRSA strains when examined in the same model (15). The addition of CEF to DAP in this study did not show any additional activity, as DAP was rapidly and persistently bactericidal alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, when linezolid must be prescribed, hypermutable strains should be detected by the disk diffusion method (14), and the antibiotic should be administered in combination (22,55), particularly for prolonged treatment. Finally, mutators should be included in the preliminary tests of any new antibiotic.…”
Section: Vol 54 2010 Linezolid Against Hypermutator Cocci In a Pk-pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations using in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models have evaluated the efficiency of linezolid (1,6,22,24,28,49). However, most of these studies used a one-compartment model, which does not avoid dilution of the bacterial population, and none has investigated the impact of the mutator phenotype on the selection of resistant mutants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a). The correlation has been shown to be reproducible and holds for at least 4-log-fold drops in viable counts, well above the sensitivity deemed sufficient to monitor bactericidal agents (14). When this correlation between photons and viable counts in a killing environment is compared to a series of log-fold dilution standards, prepared to give different cell densities per disc in the absence of an antimicrobial agent, there was a significant difference (P Ͻ 0.0001) (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%