2005
DOI: 10.1128/aac.49.6.2189-2199.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Evolution of Levofloxacin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: Previously, we demonstrated the importance of low-level-resistant variants to the evolution of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus exposed to ciprofloxacin in an in vitro system and developed a pharmacodynamic model which predicted the emergence of resistance. Here, we examine and model the evolution of resistance to levofloxacin in S. aureus exposed to simulated levofloxacin pharmacokinetic profiles. Enrichment of subpopulations with mutations in grlA and low-level resistance varied with levofloxacin exposure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we did not observe in our experiment such a relationship between T MSW and R-8ϫMIC subpopulation enrichment (Fig. 2, panels A1 and A2), which is in agreement with a previous in vitro study with Staphylococcus aureus (8), although it is important to note that the target of mutation resistance differs between grampositive and gram-negative bacteria (11). Recently, it was suggested that the apparent inability of T MSW to predict resistantmutant enrichment may be explained by the confounding influence of the actual antimicrobial concentrations at the edges of the selection window (10,17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, we did not observe in our experiment such a relationship between T MSW and R-8ϫMIC subpopulation enrichment (Fig. 2, panels A1 and A2), which is in agreement with a previous in vitro study with Staphylococcus aureus (8), although it is important to note that the target of mutation resistance differs between grampositive and gram-negative bacteria (11). Recently, it was suggested that the apparent inability of T MSW to predict resistantmutant enrichment may be explained by the confounding influence of the actual antimicrobial concentrations at the edges of the selection window (10,17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Testing involving S. aureus and using in vitro dynamic models reveals that drug-resistant mutants fail to amplify when fluctuating fluoroquinolone concentrations are maintained above or below the selection window that has been determined using agar plates; as expected, mutants are selectively amplified when concentrations are between the MIC and the MPC [31]. Similar observations were obtained with S. pneumoniae [32] and by additional experments with S. aureus [26,33,34]. The principle has also been extended to S. aureus for vancomycin and daptomycin [35].…”
Section: Dynamic Models and The Window Hypothesissupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, position in the window may be important for determining the effect of exposure time, because many more mutants-both in amount and type-are found in the lower portion of the window than in the upper portion, and because drug concentrations near the top of the window may be more effective at killing some mutant types [10]. The evolution of mutants may be a complex process that sometimes exhibits a correlation between time inside the window and outgrowth of mutants [35] and sometimes does not [26,33,34].…”
Section: Dynamic Models and The Window Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models with one, two, or three preexisting populations with different susceptibilities to the respective antibiotic were considered similarly to previously described models (8,14,19,22,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). The susceptibility of each population was estimated via a specific rate of bacterial killing by the respective antibiotic (Fig.…”
Section: Fig 2 Mechanistic Synergy With Drug B Enhancing the Rate Of mentioning
confidence: 99%