2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-01148-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacists views on participating in New Zealand’s community pharmacy anticoagulation management service: a mixed-methods study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether conducted by a pharmacist through a service like CPAMS or done by one's self, point-of-care testing of INR levels was generally appreciated both by people taking OACs and their providers. [6][7][8][9][10] For example, CPAMS and self-testing were described as improving the convenience of INR testing by increasing the number of sites available to conduct testing while decreasing the wait time associated with queues for blood draws and receiving the results of these blood draws. [6][7][8]10 With this similarity in mind, we have nevertheless chosen to separate out the 2 forms of point-of-care testing in our presentation of the analysis below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Whether conducted by a pharmacist through a service like CPAMS or done by one's self, point-of-care testing of INR levels was generally appreciated both by people taking OACs and their providers. [6][7][8][9][10] For example, CPAMS and self-testing were described as improving the convenience of INR testing by increasing the number of sites available to conduct testing while decreasing the wait time associated with queues for blood draws and receiving the results of these blood draws. [6][7][8]10 With this similarity in mind, we have nevertheless chosen to separate out the 2 forms of point-of-care testing in our presentation of the analysis below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two publications, derived from 1 study, described using a mixed-methods study design. 6,7 The remaining publications did not describe a study design, but all were qualitative and used 1 of the following for data analysis: thematic analysis, 8 framework analysis, 9 or content analysis. 10 Four publications (including the qualitative portions of both mixed-methods publications) used interviews to collect data [6][7][8][9] and 1 publication used text mining from blog posts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations