Pharmacists’ Perspectives on the Use of My Health Record

Abstract

(1) Background: My Health Record (MHR) is a relatively new nationwide Australian digital health record system accessible by patients and a range of healthcare professionals. Pharmacists will be key contributors and users of the MHR system, yet little is known about the perceived barriers and benefits of use. (2) Objective: To explore pharmacists’ perspectives related to potential benefits and barriers associated with use of MHR. (3) Methods: An online survey was developed and face-validated. The survey was advertised to Australian pharmacists on pharmacy professional bodies’ websites. This was a cross-sectional study using an anonymous questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the distribution of the data. Chi-square, Kendall’s tau coefficient (tau-c) and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to examine the relationships where appropriate. (4) Results: A total of 63 pharmacists completed the survey. The majority of respondents worked in a metropolitan area (74%), and the most common workplace setting was community pharmacy (65%). Perceived benefits identified by responders include that the use of MHR would help with continuity of care (90%), and that it would improve the safety (71%) and quality (75%) of care they provided. Importantly, more than half of pharmacists surveyed agreed that MHR could reduce medication errors during dispensing (57%) and could improve professional relationships with patients (57%) and general practitioners (59%). Potential barriers identified by pharmacists included patients’ concerns about privacy (81%), pharmacists’ own concern about privacy (46%), lack of training, access to and confidence in using the system. Sixty six percent of respondents had concerns about the accuracy of information contained within MHR, particularly among hospital and general practice pharmacists (p = 0.016) and almost half (44%) had concerns about the security of information in the system, mainly pharmacists working at general practice and providing medication review services (p = 0.007). Overall satisfaction with MHR varied, with 48% satisfied, 33% neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and 19% dissatisfied, with a higher satisfaction rate among younger pharmacists (p = 0.032). (5) Conclusions: Pharmacists considered that the MHR offered key potential benefits, notably improving the safety and quality of care provided. To optimize the use of MHR, there is a need to improve privacy and data security measures, and to ensure adequate provision of user support and education surrounding the ability to integrate use of MHR with existing workflows and software.

Integrating Pharmacy and Registry Data Strengthens Clinical Assessments of Patient Adherence

“…Further work is needed to realize the full utility of centralized datasets in community pharmacy practice and automated systems and specific frameworks developed to facilitate this. This will allow integration with workflow and software to optimize health benefits and best safeguards patient privacy (Wright and Twigg, 2016;Kosari et al, 2020).…”

Automated Decision Support For Community Mental Health Services Using National Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Implementation Case Study

“…Like other national EHRs, the aim of MyHR was to support secure patient data sharing across the health care system to improve patient outcomes and reduce the time clinicians spend gathering clinical information [ 27 ]. However, despite the potential for change, the uptake and use of MyHR data in acute services has been slow [ 41 , 48 ]. The use of CDSS based on EHRs is growing, and while implementation can be challenging, the potential benefits are improved outcomes for patients through early intervention to prevent relapse and hospitalization and increased efficiency for the health care system.…”

The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review

“…Access to health information 10 (83) Access logs [10,11,17,23,75,96,100,103,105] 9 (75) Share or restrict access to providers [10,11,17,23,73,105] 8 (67) Provide access to trusted individual [10,11,23,96,103] 7 (58) Parental access to child's record [10,11,17,23,96] Appointment information 9 (75) Visits (time, date, or provider) [10,11,17,23,96,103] 8 (67) Book appointments [10,11,17,103] 6 (50) Referrals [23,75] Reports or notes 10 (83) Clinical summaries [10,11,17,96,103,105] 10 (83) Laboratory results…”