Pharmacists’ perceptions of their working conditions and the factors influencing this: Results from 5 Canadian provinces

Abstract

Introduction: Our previous study in British Columbia (BC) indicated that pharmacists have a poor perception of their working conditions. The objective of this study is to assess pharmacists’ perceptions of their working conditions in 4 other Canadian provinces. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study across Alberta, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador, using a survey adapted from the Oregon Board of Pharmacy. Data collected previously from BC were also included in the analyses. The survey was emailed to all pharmacist registrants. Respondents were provided with 6 statements and asked to rate their agreement with them, using a 5-point Likert scale. Statements were framed such that agreement with them indicated good perception of working conditions. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the relationship between workplace factors on perception of working conditions. Results: Pharmacists perceived their working conditions to be poor. Pharmacists indicated that they do not have time for break/lunch (48.3% of respondents), work in environments that are not conducive to safe and effective primary care (26.5%), are not satisfied with the amount of time they have to do their job (44.0%) and face shortage of staff (shortage of pharmacists: 33.7%, technicians: 36.4%, clerk staff: 30.3%). Significant factors associated with poor perception were workplace-imposed quotas, high prescription volume, working in chain pharmacies and long prescription wait times. Conclusion: A high percentage of Canadian pharmacists perceived their working conditions to be poor. Considering the patient-related consequences of pharmacists’ poor working conditions and the system-related reasons identified behind it, we call for collaborative efforts to tackle this issue.

Coping with the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of community pharmacists from Serbia

“…In an unprecedented “infodemic”, inaccurate and incomplete information about coronavirus spread rapidly adding to the fear and the anxiety of the public [ 39 , 42 , 43 ]. Most of respondents reported not having enough time to devote to clients, but such lack of time was observed even in non-pandemic circumstances [ 44 ].…”

Assessment of Burnout Among Canadian Pharmacists Working in Team-based Primary Care Settings

“… 16 A follow-up study expanding the evaluation to additional provinces in Canada demonstrated a poor perception of working conditions among pharmacist respondents, which may contribute to occupational burnout. 17 …”

“…16 A follow-up study expanding the evaluation to additional provinces in Canada demonstrated a poor perception of working conditions among pharmacist respondents, which may contribute to occupational burnout. 17 Based on the 2019 United States (U.S.) National Pharmacist Workforce Study, 6% of pharmacists in the U.S. were working in an ambulatory care setting between 2014 and 2019. 18 Pharmacist burnout was assessed using the Professional Fulfillment Index, that correlates with the MBI.…”

Pharmacists’ Satisfaction with Work and Working Conditions in New Zealand—An Updated Survey and a Comparison to Canada

“…However, in many jurisdictions, these changes have been slow to be implemented producing additional work-related stress [ 3 , 4 ]. Studies around the globe have continued to identify common factors contributing to workplace stress for pharmacists in the past decade [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ].…”

“…Adapted from the Oregon Board of Pharmacy survey on pharmacists’ perception of their working conditions [ 21 ], Tsao et al initially surveyed pharmacists working in British Columbia, Canada in 2013 [ 22 ] and then extended the survey to include four other Canadian provinces (Alberta, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, and Prince Edward Island) to further identify aspects that contributed to Canadian pharmacists’ perspectives of their working conditions [ 23 ]. The results show that the majority were satisfied that their working environment assisted in delivering safe and effective patient care; however, most were dissatisfied by the inadequate break time for lunch, staffing levels, and duration to complete their task at hand.…”