2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceuticals in a Mediterranean Basin: The influence of temporal and hydrological patterns in environmental risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the corticoid BUD exhibited negative correlation with temperature (r = −0.787, p<0.01). The higher water temperatures in combination with long daylight periods may be important factors for the increment of biodegradation rates and phototransformation mechanisms of some PhACs ( Palma et al, 2020 ). In another aspect, temperature may affect the usage pattern of some PhACs, since some diseases (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, the corticoid BUD exhibited negative correlation with temperature (r = −0.787, p<0.01). The higher water temperatures in combination with long daylight periods may be important factors for the increment of biodegradation rates and phototransformation mechanisms of some PhACs ( Palma et al, 2020 ). In another aspect, temperature may affect the usage pattern of some PhACs, since some diseases (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RQs based on the ratio between Measured Environmental Concentration (MEC) and Predicted No-Effect Concentration (PNEC), for three aquatic organisms; fish, invertebrates and algae. Concerning MEC, two different scenarios were applied: (a) the worst case scenario by using the maximum concentration of each PhAC and (b) using the average concentration of each PhAC ( Palma et al, 2020 ), as a less conservative scenario. PNEC has been determined: (i) for acute toxicity, using the lowest values of EC50 or LC50 divided by an assessment factor (AF) of 1000 and (ii) for chronic toxicity, using NOEC divided by an AF of 100, 50 and 10 when one long-term NOEC, two-long term NOECs or three long-term NOECs, from the three aquatic organisms are available, respectively ( European Commission, 2003 ; Kosma et al, 2014 , 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenobarbital has been found in urban wastewater effluents at 0.09–0.21 μg L −1 , and at concentrations of ≤0.05 μg L −1 in downstream surface waters [ 35 ]. On the other hand, acetaminophen is also frequently found in natural and drinking water worldwide, reaching concentrations of over 500 ng L −1 in river waters [ 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 ]. In our previous study, acetaminophen was not efficiently adsorbed by TpBD-(CF 3 ) 2 , which we attributed to its higher hydrophilicity (log D 6.0 = 0.34) as compared to ibuprofen (log D 6.0 = 2.12) [ 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenobarbital has been found in urban wastewater effluents at 0.09-0.21 µg L −1 , and at concentrations of ≤0.05 μg L −1 in downstream surface waters [35]. On the other hand, acetaminophen is also frequently found in natural and drinking water worldwide, reaching concentrations of over 500 ng L −1 in river waters [2,3,5,6]. In our previous study, acetaminophen was not efficiently adsorbed In the models with two ibuprofen molecules in the COF pore the average interaction per one ibuprofen molecule between the deprotonated form and the COF structure was −19 kcal mol −1 , whereas for the protonated form a slightly enhanced value of −21 kcal mol −1 was found.…”
Section: Comparative Extractions Of Ibuprofen Phenobarbital and Acementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation