1995
DOI: 10.1155/1995/975209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceutical, Pharmacokinetic and Other Considerations for Intravenous to Oral Stepdown Therapy

Abstract: Parenteral to oral stepdown therapy represents an effective cost containment strategy which can minimize intravenous therapy associated morbidity and may facilitate earlier hospital discharge. Several oral anti-infectives are available to the prescriber and there are as many opportunities to stepdown to the same agent as there are to other drugs of the same class or other classes. Recognition of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of these oral agents is essential lo successful therapy. Good bioavailability ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients with severe infections who are able to tolerate oral therapy and in whom clinical improvement has been documented, the goal should be to streamline therapy to the oral route as soon as possible. There is evidence to suggest that this approach positively impacts length of stay as well (42).…”
Section: Intravenous Versus Oral Therapy Step-down Options and Additional Carementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For patients with severe infections who are able to tolerate oral therapy and in whom clinical improvement has been documented, the goal should be to streamline therapy to the oral route as soon as possible. There is evidence to suggest that this approach positively impacts length of stay as well (42).…”
Section: Intravenous Versus Oral Therapy Step-down Options and Additional Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In choosing an appropriate step-down oral antibiotic, there are three options (42). First, one may choose the same active antibiotic in oral form with high bioavailability.…”
Section: Intravenous Versus Oral Therapy Step-down Options and Additional Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they selected cefazoline every 12 h with probenecid (Benemid, Merck Sharpe & Dohme Canada, Kirkland, Quebec) (11), use of once daily aminosides (12), the use of clindamycin (Dalacin C, Pharmacia & Upjohn Inc, Mississauga, Ontario) 1200 mg every 12 h (13) if minimum inhibitory concentrations of isolate bacteria were low. As another example, intravenous use of ciprofloxacin (Cipro, Bayer Inc, Toronto, Ontario) and metronidazol were restricted because of good bioavilability (more than 80%) (14). Infectious disease specialists prepared a routine set of blood tests for toxicity surveillance and recommended drug dosages for each order of intravenous antibiotics (15).…”
Section: Program Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inserting a 1-acetoxyethyl ester group into the cefuroxime molecule yields the prodrug cefuroxime axetil (CA), which increases its lipophilicity and facilitates absorption through the intestinal mucosa [6]. After oral administration, the prodrug is rapidly hydrolyzed and de-esterified in the intestinal mucosa and portal circulation, releasing an active moiety of cefuroxime into the systemic circulation [7][8][9]. CA exhibits weak antibacterial activity in its prodrug form, and it only becomes active after de-esterification to cefuroxime [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%