2016
DOI: 10.32508/stdj.v19i3.580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceutical crystallization in Couette-Taylor crystallizer: A case study of polymorphism of amino acid L-glutamic acid

Abstract: The influence of intensity Taylor vortex flow in Couette-Taylor crystallizer on the crystallization of polymorphic amino acid L-glutamic acid was investigated in cooling crystallization. Here, the L-glutamic acid was chosen as the model crystal product, where it has two kinds of polymorphism including the unstable phase α-form and stable phase β-form crystal. In cooling crystallization, the α-form crystal transformed to the β-form crystal corresponding to the phase transformation of α-form to β-form crystal. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is not surprising that in the recent years increased research efforts have been made to develop and assess new crystallisers to achieve efficient process operation and enhanced particle control, these include mixed suspension mixed product removal (MSMPR) with single or multiple stages (cascade), plug flow reactors (PFRs) and Couette-Taylor crystallisers. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Also, well characterised experimental and digital design methodologies for process design, scale-up and optimisation of processes using these technologies have received considerable attention. 13 MSMPRs remain the most widely utilised platform for continuous crystallisation largely due to familiarity in terms of operation and control to existing batch equipment and these have been successfully operated at a range of scales from 1-10 L. 14 There are however, some recognised disadvantages of MSMPRs that include localised high shear near the impeller or agitator, non-uniform thermal control and nonlinear process scalability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is not surprising that in the recent years increased research efforts have been made to develop and assess new crystallisers to achieve efficient process operation and enhanced particle control, these include mixed suspension mixed product removal (MSMPR) with single or multiple stages (cascade), plug flow reactors (PFRs) and Couette-Taylor crystallisers. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Also, well characterised experimental and digital design methodologies for process design, scale-up and optimisation of processes using these technologies have received considerable attention. 13 MSMPRs remain the most widely utilised platform for continuous crystallisation largely due to familiarity in terms of operation and control to existing batch equipment and these have been successfully operated at a range of scales from 1-10 L. 14 There are however, some recognised disadvantages of MSMPRs that include localised high shear near the impeller or agitator, non-uniform thermal control and nonlinear process scalability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%