2008
DOI: 10.1080/02841850802314770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phantom-calibrated versus automatic coronary artery mass quantification with multidetector-row computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo study

Abstract: Our data indicate that multidetector-row computed tomography coronary calcium mass determination based on dedicated phantom calibration shows lower measurement error than an automatic software-based calculation method. The tested automatic software does not yet seem to be a reliable option for calcium mass measurement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional advantage of this method was that it was used in this study with ECG triggering. The triggering is a standard option in the calcium scoring protocol, and significantly reduces artifacts related to heart motion [ 14 , 15 ]. As shown by Gorter et al ., measurements of fat volume by computed tomography have good reproducibility and a low coefficient of variation ranging from 3.0% to 5.0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An additional advantage of this method was that it was used in this study with ECG triggering. The triggering is a standard option in the calcium scoring protocol, and significantly reduces artifacts related to heart motion [ 14 , 15 ]. As shown by Gorter et al ., measurements of fat volume by computed tomography have good reproducibility and a low coefficient of variation ranging from 3.0% to 5.0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All subjects underwent an ECG-gated cardiac CT scanning according to the coronary calcium scoring protocol using a 64-row Philips Brilliance unit [ 14 , 15 ]. No intravenous contrast media nor premedication were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All subjects underwent an ECG-gated cardiac CT scanning according to the coronary calcium scoring protocol using a 64-row Philips Brilliance unit [6,7]. Acquisition of data was performed in 2.5-mm slices at 120 kV and 75 mAs, with an FOV of 220 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the application automatically calculated Agatston’s CS. Due to the high skewness of CS values, the data were log-transformed before statistical analysis [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%