1984
DOI: 10.3109/00313028409068531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phagocytosis of virulent and avirulent leptospires by guinea-pig and human polymorphonuclear leukocytes in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…LPS has been identified, by monoclonal antibodies, as an important protective antigen in acute infections with other gram-negative bacteria (Colwell et al, 1984;Kirkland and Ziegler, 1984;Sawada et al, 1984), but it was not possible to perform protection experiments with serovar hardjo as it does not cause lethal infections in laboratory animals. The importance of opsonisation and phagocytosis as host defence mechanisms against leptospirosis is well established (Cinco et al, 1982;Tu et al, 1982;McGrath et al, 1984) and these observations together with the opsonic activities of our monoclonal antibodies identify LPS as an important protective antigen in leptospires of serovar hardjo. The significance of LPS in immunity and prevention of leptospirosis thus requires further study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LPS has been identified, by monoclonal antibodies, as an important protective antigen in acute infections with other gram-negative bacteria (Colwell et al, 1984;Kirkland and Ziegler, 1984;Sawada et al, 1984), but it was not possible to perform protection experiments with serovar hardjo as it does not cause lethal infections in laboratory animals. The importance of opsonisation and phagocytosis as host defence mechanisms against leptospirosis is well established (Cinco et al, 1982;Tu et al, 1982;McGrath et al, 1984) and these observations together with the opsonic activities of our monoclonal antibodies identify LPS as an important protective antigen in leptospires of serovar hardjo. The significance of LPS in immunity and prevention of leptospirosis thus requires further study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…When required, 10-pl volumes of monoclonal antibodies or mouse anti-hardjo serum at subagglutinating concentrations (such that the final dilution was double the MAT titre) or normal mouse serum or DME-FCS (final dilution 1 in 100) were added to CL vials, followed by leptospires at a ratio of 1 OO/macrophage. CL measurements were performed as described previously (McGrath et al, 1984). For immunofluorescence, lo8 leptospires were incubated with lo6 macrophages for 30 min at 37"C, the monolayers washed with phosphate-buffered saline pH 7.2 (PBS), fixed for 10 min in formalin 10% v/v in PBS, and washed three times in PBS.…”
Section: Opsonisation and Phagocytosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virulent leptospires become associated with neutrophils, but are not killed (117,613). Phagocytosis occurs only in the presence of serum and complement (385), suggesting that the outer envelope of leptospires possesses an antiphagocytic component. Leptospiral LPS stimulated adherence of neutrophils to endothelial cells (166,298) and platelets, causing aggregation and suggesting a role in the development of thrombocytopenia (298).…”
Section: Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunity to infection is mediated principally by antibodies, which opsonize leptospires for phagocytosis by both neutrophils and macrophages (29,39) and also mediate complement-dependent killing (1). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is the major component of the leptospiral cell surface (10a, 41).…”
Section: Cells) Offering the Potential To Analyze Bacterial Surface Ementioning
confidence: 99%