2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2164(06)59006-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phage for Rapid Detection and Control of Bacterial Pathogens in Food

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phages are widely distributed in the environment (12) and represent part of the natural microbiological flora of foods (27,54,55). Especially suitable for biocontrol purposes are virulent (strictly lytic) phages; they cannot integrate their genome into the bacterial chromosome to form lysogens and will always lyse and kill infected target cells.The current standing of the use of phages against undesired bacteria in food systems has been summarized previously (22,26,44). Briefly, phages were tested in foods contaminated with strains of Campylobacter (19,35), Escherichia coli (1, 41), Enterobacter (28), Pseudomonas (17, 23), Brochothrix (24), Salmonella (31,33,40,43,53), and Listeria (10,16,32,33,34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phages are widely distributed in the environment (12) and represent part of the natural microbiological flora of foods (27,54,55). Especially suitable for biocontrol purposes are virulent (strictly lytic) phages; they cannot integrate their genome into the bacterial chromosome to form lysogens and will always lyse and kill infected target cells.The current standing of the use of phages against undesired bacteria in food systems has been summarized previously (22,26,44). Briefly, phages were tested in foods contaminated with strains of Campylobacter (19,35), Escherichia coli (1, 41), Enterobacter (28), Pseudomonas (17, 23), Brochothrix (24), Salmonella (31,33,40,43,53), and Listeria (10,16,32,33,34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there may be host inhibitory factors that can prevent phage replication and lysis but may not inhibit luxAB expression, such as the presence of a prophage in the cell, DNA restriction-modification, lysis resistant mutants, and even phage-specific inhibition genes (abortive infection) (7). Thus, it is possible that the reporter phage can have a detection range that is wider that the parental phage cell lysis host range (19,27). Our results indicate that the reporter phage did not transduce a bioluminescent signal to E. coli K-12 or E. coli B, but 1 of the 10 Y. enterocolitica strains (CDC 497-70) tested produced an attenuated bioluminescent signal ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A similar lysis assay using ␥ phage is FDA approved as a standard for the identification of B. anthracis isolates (1). In an effort to significantly reduce the time to detection and to enable detection in complex matrices such as food or clinical specimens, reporter phages are being developed as biodetectors of pathogenic bacteria (27). For example, reporter phages have been generated for E. coli O157:H7 and L. monocytogenes and have proven effective for the detection of bacteria in a range of diverse food matrices such as milk, ground beef, spinach, and soft cheese (4,22,23,25,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-propagating capacity of lytic bacteriophages is also an advantage concerning the amount of inoculant to be added, decreasing in principle the processing costs. Phages have been shown to control the growth of pathogens such as L. monocytogenes, Salmonella and Campylobacter jejuni, as well as spoilage organisms in fruit, dairy products, poultry and red meats (Greer, 2005;Hudson et al, 2005;Rees and Dodd, 2006). Nevertheless, due to their high strain specificity, it is often necessary to apply complex phage mixtures, making the phage selection procedures rather complicated.…”
Section: Application Of Lytic Bacteriophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%