1986
DOI: 10.1002/jobm.3620260106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phage adsorption and productive lysis in stable protoplast type L‐forms of Bacillus subtilis and Streptomyces hygroscopicus

Abstract: Transferable productive lysis in stable protoplast type L-form cells of Bacillus subtilis was produced by 6 phages out of 14 strains virulent for the parent B. subtilis 170 and 1997. Most of these phages lytic for L-forms show the phi 29 morphology characteristic for the smallest B. subtilis phages containing double-stranded DNA. Among 31 actinophages, 23 of which were virulent for Streptomyces hygroscopicus, only SLE 109 and phi c 31 gave productive infection of the stable protoplast type L-form of S. hygrosc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we assume this to be true, would there already be a sign of coevolution between the phage's RPBs and the CWD surface-associated molecules? Most research about CWD bacteria, such as mycoplasma, protoplasts and Lforms, and their interaction with phages, date from the premolecular era [65][66][67]. It would be interesting to explore their interaction with more modern technologies, such as cryo-EM, next-generation sequencing or genome editing.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we assume this to be true, would there already be a sign of coevolution between the phage's RPBs and the CWD surface-associated molecules? Most research about CWD bacteria, such as mycoplasma, protoplasts and Lforms, and their interaction with phages, date from the premolecular era [65][66][67]. It would be interesting to explore their interaction with more modern technologies, such as cryo-EM, next-generation sequencing or genome editing.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%