Whether
SO4
2– or HSO4
– is the dominating adsorbate on the Pd(111) electrode,
and what is(are) the driving force responsible for its(their) formation
are fundamental issues in interfacial electrochemistry that remain
unsolved. In this work, the effect of pH on (bi)sulfate adsorption
on Pd(111) in electrolytic solutions of pH values from 0 to 13 is
systematically studied by cyclic voltammetry. The onset potential
for (bi)sulfate adsorption is ca. 0.23 V vs the reversible hydrogen
electrode (RHE) in solution at pH = 1. When the solution pH increases
from 0 to 3, the peak potential of sulfate adsorption shifts positively
with a slope of ca. 20–40 mV/pH. In alkaline solutions at pH
> 10, sulfate adsorption takes place at E >
0.55
VRHE, falling into the potential region where OHad occurs. After carefully analyzing the related onset/peak potential
of (bi)sulfate desorption/adsorption to the thermodynamic equilibrium
potential of possible electrode reactions and the corresponding Faradic
charge due to adsorption, we propose that the adsorbate on Pd(111)
is most probably SO4*, no matter whether the main precursor
for its adsorption is HSO4
– or SO4
2– in the bulk solution. This is supported
by the pH- and composition-dependent change of the electrochemical
potential of related processes and the fact that only a single band
for S-containing adsorbate is detected by infrared spectroscopy. The
fact that the onset potential for sulfate adsorption is negative compared
to the potential of zero charge of Pd(111) suggests that pH-modulated
electrochemical potential of the reactants, rather than the pH-dependent
surface charging behavior, is the dominant factor of the observed
pH effect on sulfate adsorption on Pd(111).