2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pH dependent aggregation and conformation changes of rituximab using SAXS and its comparison with the standard regulatory approach of biophysical characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact knowledge of these structural parameters is of paramount importance to simulate the crystallization behavior of the antibody in the framework of theoretical models for diffusion-limited nucleation of macromolecules in solution ( Lutsko, 2019 ). The R g value of rituximab at pH 6.5 is compatible with that recently reported by Narvekar et al (2020) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The exact knowledge of these structural parameters is of paramount importance to simulate the crystallization behavior of the antibody in the framework of theoretical models for diffusion-limited nucleation of macromolecules in solution ( Lutsko, 2019 ). The R g value of rituximab at pH 6.5 is compatible with that recently reported by Narvekar et al (2020) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, there have been limited studies involving the use of X-ray crystallography (XRC), a traditional technique for protein structural studies at the near-atomic level, as it works well only with proteins that can be crystallized, it requires expensive instrumentation, trained operators, and extensive time for analysis ( Lerch et al, 2020 ). If we look at the evolution of HOS assessment in biosimilarity studies ( Figure 4 ), the timeline is peppered with multiple orthogonal techniques such as single dimension NMR ( Visser et al, 2013 ; Sörgel et al, 2015 ; Montacir et al, 2017 ), multi-dimension NMR ( Shekhawat et al, 2019 ; Bor Tekdemir et al, 2020 ; Kovács et al, 2020 ), HDX-MS ( Cho et al, 2016 ; Brokx et al, 2017 ; Brown et al, 2019 ), IM-MS ( Fang et al, 2016 ; Montacir et al, 2017 , 2018 ), antibody conformational array ( Jung et al, 2014 ; Hong et al, 2017 ), aptamer-based enzyme linked apta-sorbent assay ( Wildner et al, 2019 ), and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) ( Narvekar et al, 2020 ) ( Supplementary Table S4 ). Of these, NMR has emerged as the new gold standard for HOS assessment with more than 10 published biosimilarity studies published with either 1D, or 1D and 2D as a part of the analytical platform ( Supplementary Table S4 ).…”
Section: Global Landscape On Biosimilar Approvalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…181 In the past years, numerous publications have used CD as an orthogonal method to study and characterize mAb aggregation. 88,97,120,183,184 Furthermore, Joshi et al employed this analytical method as a high-throughput screening tool for examining mAb stability in various buffers, proving that CD is a reliable method for rapid monitoring of mAb conformational changes.…”
Section: Circular Dichroism (Cd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past years, numerous publications have used CD as an orthogonal method to study and characterize mAb aggregation 88,97,120,183,184 . Furthermore, Joshi et al .…”
Section: Miniaturizable Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%