2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-012-0483-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pH buffering capacity of acid soils from tropical and subtropical regions of China as influenced by incorporation of crop straw biochars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
122
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
122
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that BS was typically less than 8% along all soil profiles, which was greatly lower than other sites in tropical zones with low atmospheric N deposition (Krusche et al, 2003;Xu et al, 2012). Research on soil acidification in southern China and SE Asia suggested that 20% of BS could be used as a threshold for estimating acidification damage (Hicks et al, 2008).…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Our results showed that BS was typically less than 8% along all soil profiles, which was greatly lower than other sites in tropical zones with low atmospheric N deposition (Krusche et al, 2003;Xu et al, 2012). Research on soil acidification in southern China and SE Asia suggested that 20% of BS could be used as a threshold for estimating acidification damage (Hicks et al, 2008).…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…46 Relative to 2:1 clay minerals, 1:1 kaolinite makes a minor contribution to soil CEC and leads to lower soil pH buffering capacity. 47 The continued weathering process will lead to Al 3+ release from 1:1 minerals and subsequent dominance in soil. Furthermore, hydrolysis of Al 3+ can result in release of H + to soil solution, constantly lowering its pH.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Soil Buffering Capacity In Tropicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 Studying in the tropical and subtropical regions of China, Xu et al found that soil pH buffering capacity was positively related to the contents of soil organic matter and soil CEC, and suggested that protonation/deprotonation was the main mechanism for organic matter contribution to soil pH buffering capacity. 47 The greater CEC indicates that soil can provide more cation exchange sites to take up H + and to buffer input of acid to soils. Commonly, low CEC soils are more likely to develop base cation (such as Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ) deficiencies, whereas high CEC soils are less susceptible to leaching losses of these cations.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Soil Buffering Capacity In Tropicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a) were: 3.04, 2.95, and 2.66 respectively for 40 M, 10 M30B, and control gnocchi samples. Buffering capacity indicates the ability of food to resist changes in pH (Xu et al 2012). The highest pH in the 40M gnocchi sample may be attributed to inorganic phosphate, proteinbound L-histidine residues, free L-histidine or histidine-related dipeptides in meat that played a key role in buffering (Culbertson et al 2010).…”
Section: Sensory Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%