2009
DOI: 10.1080/10298430802342765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PFWD, DCP and CBR correlations for evaluation of lateritic subgrades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were also obtained by George et al (2009) for lateritic subgrades. Livneh and Livneh (2013) suggest that such equations, owing to the considerable uncertainty associated with DCP tests results, should be used in tandem with conventional density tests, such as the nuclear gauge.…”
Section: Anvilsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were also obtained by George et al (2009) for lateritic subgrades. Livneh and Livneh (2013) suggest that such equations, owing to the considerable uncertainty associated with DCP tests results, should be used in tandem with conventional density tests, such as the nuclear gauge.…”
Section: Anvilsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Penetration from surface to 6-inch depth NDCP ð6 00 2to212 00 Þ ¼ 27 £ e ½20:08£PI£ðF 40=100Þ PI: Plasticity index of compacted soil (%) Penetration from 6-inch to 12-inch depth from top of compacted soil F40: Percentage passing #40 sieve Hopkins, 2000;George, Rao, & Shivashankar, 2009;Mohammad & Herath, 2007). Salgado and Yoon (2003) developed the following correlation between the DCP penetration ratio PR and the in situ dry density of clayey sands:…”
Section: Anvilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between DCPI and CBR for different types of soil can be expressed by the following equation (Harison, 1987;Webster et al, 1992;Gabr et al, 2000;George et al, 2009):…”
Section: Dcp Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phillips and Freeman (2003), Nazzal (2003) and George et al (2009) showed that there is good correlation between these parameters; whereas, poor correlation was reported in some other research works (Seyman 2003;Phillips 2005). In addition, different correlations have been determined between the PFWD and FWD back-calculation moduli (Steinert et al 2006;George 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portable Falling Weight Deflectometer (PFWD) is a light device which can serve as possible alternative replacement. Due to its simplicity in design, portability, and the added advantages of providing quick and reliable estimates of the stiffness modulus, the use of PFWD is gaining popularity in the recent years (George et al 2009). Although multiple versions of these devices have been evaluated in the U.S., Europe, and Japan for quality control during construction, the applicability of using this equipment is relatively unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%