2007
DOI: 10.1160/th06-09-0493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PFA-100 closure times in preoperative screening in 500 pediatric patients

Abstract: Three to five percent of patients undergoing surgery have either an acquired or congenital platelet defect or von Willebrand disease (vWD). The predictive value of preoperative coagulation screening is questionable. PFA-100 is now routinely used in preoperative screening in our pediatric outpatient service. We wanted to assess whether the PFA-100 would help to identify patients with primary haemostatic defects or if the additional use of PFA-100 would add to the problem of unnecessary pathologic preoperative l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the frequency of bleeding episodes was higher (17.6%) in patients with prolonged CT-epi values than in patients with prolonged PT, INR or aPTT in the present study, there was no statistical difference between patients with prolonged CT-epi values and patients with normal CT-epi values ( P =0.171). Results of the present study are similar to those of the earlier study, which reported that CT values are not necessary in general unselective screening 17. It has been reported that the PFA-100 result during the perioperative period cannot predict the intensity of perioperative bleeding in patients undergoing neurosurgery, heart surgery or hemiarthroplasty 1820.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although the frequency of bleeding episodes was higher (17.6%) in patients with prolonged CT-epi values than in patients with prolonged PT, INR or aPTT in the present study, there was no statistical difference between patients with prolonged CT-epi values and patients with normal CT-epi values ( P =0.171). Results of the present study are similar to those of the earlier study, which reported that CT values are not necessary in general unselective screening 17. It has been reported that the PFA-100 result during the perioperative period cannot predict the intensity of perioperative bleeding in patients undergoing neurosurgery, heart surgery or hemiarthroplasty 1820.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, preoperative correction of impaired haemostasis results in a reduction of bleeding complications and homologous blood transfusions [56]. On the other hand, the study of Roschitz et al [57] shows that the PFA-100 is probably only a good screening method when a haemostatic defect in a patient is clinically likely, especially to screen for von Willebrand syndrome, and the test should not be used in general unselective screening without positive bleeding history. Based on the above mentioned studies and consensus of experts, the scientific committee of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI) in agreement with the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf-und Hals-Chirurgie (DGHNOKC) and the Gesellschaft für Thrombose-und Hä-mostaseforschung (GTH), as well as with the subcommittee for perioperative coagulation of the Österreichische Gesellschaft für Anaesthesiologie, Reanimation und Intensivmedizin (ÖGARI) recommend the use of a standardized questionnaire to detect an increased risk of bleeding [58,59].…”
Section: Standardized Questionnaire For Bleeding Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the test should not be used in general unselective screening without positive bleeding history [54,57,58,91,92]. Furthermore, the limitations in drug monitoring for clopidogrel and GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors have to be kept in mind.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koscielny et al [8] reported that PFA-100 analysis as a screening test could detect impaired hemostasis in 5649 adult patients, whereas Roschitz et al [9] concluded that this test should not be used in general unselective screening. The preoperative evaluation of platelet function before TKA has been limitedly investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%