2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PF2 fit: Polar Fast Fourier Matched Alignment of Atomistic Structures with 3D Electron Microscopy Maps

Abstract: There continue to be increasing occurrences of both atomistic structure models in the PDB (possibly reconstructed from X-ray diffraction or NMR data), and 3D reconstructed cryo-electron microscopy (3D EM) maps (albeit at coarser resolution) of the same or homologous molecule or molecular assembly, deposited in the EMDB. To obtain the best possible structural model of the molecule at the best achievable resolution, and without any missing gaps, one typically aligns (match and fits) the atomistic structure model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further optimization of the fit can then be tried using the Fit in Map routines in UCSF Chimera. Many advances have been made in both sensitivity and speed of cross-correlation based rigid body fitting (Bettadapura et al, 2015;Chacón and Wriggers, 2002;Derevyanko and Grudinin, 2014;Farabella et al, 2015;Garzón et al, 2007;Hoang et al, 2013;Hrabe et al, 2012;Roseman, 2000;Volkmann and Hanein, 1999;Volkmann, 2009;Wu et al, 2003). Recently, we introduced the coreweighted local cross-correlation scores in our rigid-body fitting package PowerFit .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further optimization of the fit can then be tried using the Fit in Map routines in UCSF Chimera. Many advances have been made in both sensitivity and speed of cross-correlation based rigid body fitting (Bettadapura et al, 2015;Chacón and Wriggers, 2002;Derevyanko and Grudinin, 2014;Farabella et al, 2015;Garzón et al, 2007;Hoang et al, 2013;Hrabe et al, 2012;Roseman, 2000;Volkmann and Hanein, 1999;Volkmann, 2009;Wu et al, 2003). Recently, we introduced the coreweighted local cross-correlation scores in our rigid-body fitting package PowerFit .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein secondary structure information, which can be extracted from maps, is demonstrated to be beneficial for both template-based fitting and de novo modeling [ 26 ]. PF2fit, which is a rigid fitting method, matches the detected secondary structures of the density map with the secondary structure units of the atomic model [ 28 ]. In 2017, Dou et al [ 29 ] developed a flexible fitting method guided by the correspondence between the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$\alpha $\end{document} -helices in the cryo-EM map and those in the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, surface-based scores such as normal vector score (NVA), which computes the difference in angle between the normal vectors of EM maps, and the chamfer distance score (CDAgdt), which calculates the average distance between closest surface points of two EM maps [81,82]. Another possible score is skeleton-secondary structure score that depends on matching the skeleton of detected secondary structures of the density map with the secondary structure units of the atomic model [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, rigid-body fitting methods search for the best placement of an atomic model in a density map. Search algorithms that have been used for rigid fitting include Fast Fourier transform-based (FFT) [14,32,35], grid-threading Monte Carlo (GTMC) [16], spherical harmonic-based search [20], and geometric hashing [27]. FFT is a fast search scheme that accelerates the 3-D translational search [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation