Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science 2020
DOI: 10.5220/0009487904300439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PF-BVM: A Privacy-aware Fog-enhanced Blockchain Validation Mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also decided to set the block size to exactly one TX per block, as each TX requires its own group of signatures even if multiple TXs per block are utilized. As increasing block sizes lead to proportional decrease in block generation rate, due to higher verification latency [33], the overall throughput shall not improve with changing the block size as proven in [34].…”
Section: The Distributed Ledgermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also decided to set the block size to exactly one TX per block, as each TX requires its own group of signatures even if multiple TXs per block are utilized. As increasing block sizes lead to proportional decrease in block generation rate, due to higher verification latency [33], the overall throughput shall not improve with changing the block size as proven in [34].…”
Section: The Distributed Ledgermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if the fog layer is controlling and automating the communications between the end-user layer and the BC network, as in Baniata & Kertész (2020) , the TXs are sent from end-users to the fog. After that, some communication takes place between the fog layer and the BC network in order to successfully perform the tasks requested by end-users.…”
Section: Bc Architectural Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we need to underline some differences between the terms verification, validation, and confirmation, and we need to see how FoBSim differentiates between those terms in different scenarios. As we have touched on these differences in Baniata & Kertész (2020), we need to accurately define each of these terms in order to correctly describe how FoBSim works. Validation is the process when a miner (either a minter or receiver) checks the correctness of a claim.…”
Section: Transaction/block Validation In Fobsimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if the fog layer is controlling and automating the communications between the end-user layer and the BC network, as in [61], the transactions are sent from end-users to the fog. After that, some communications take place between the fog layer and the BC network in order to successfully perform the tasks requested by end-users.…”
Section: Transactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we need to underline some differences between the terms Verification, Validation and Confirmation, and we need to see how FoBSim differentiates between those terms in different scenarios. As we have touched on these differences in [61], we need to accurately define each of these terms in order to correctly describe how FoBSim works.…”
Section: Transaction/block Validation In Fobsimmentioning
confidence: 99%