2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pexelizumab fails to inhibit assembly of the terminal complement complex in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Insight from a substudy of the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX-AMI) trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, from a clinical point of view, it seems as if complement inhibition with pexelizumab has no effect on primary endpoints in STEMI patients. Martel et al have tried to establish why pexelizumab failed to reduce the primary endpoint in the APEX-AMI study (APEX AMI Investigators 2007), and found that pexelizumab apparently reduced plasma C5a, but not the formation of sC5b-9, and thus not the downstream sub-lytic MAC inflammation (Martel et al, 2012). This activation probably occurred previous to the administration of the drug and thus the delayed administration could explain the lack of clinical benefit.…”
Section: Complement Inhibition In Coronary Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from a clinical point of view, it seems as if complement inhibition with pexelizumab has no effect on primary endpoints in STEMI patients. Martel et al have tried to establish why pexelizumab failed to reduce the primary endpoint in the APEX-AMI study (APEX AMI Investigators 2007), and found that pexelizumab apparently reduced plasma C5a, but not the formation of sC5b-9, and thus not the downstream sub-lytic MAC inflammation (Martel et al, 2012). This activation probably occurred previous to the administration of the drug and thus the delayed administration could explain the lack of clinical benefit.…”
Section: Complement Inhibition In Coronary Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of cardiogenic shock was reduced with 45%, however, non‐significantly. The Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial did not show any effect of pexelizumab,48 but there is a remaining question whether C5 was appropriately inhibited 49. In order to rule out if complement inhibition would be beneficial in patients with acute severe HF and cardiogenic shock due to MI, more clinical trials are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the study pooled treatment arms of the APEX-AMI study. Pexelizumab had neither an effect on clinical outcomes nor any of the study biomarkers with except IL-6 (24-levels were attenuated by pexelizumab treatment) [41].…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%