2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/791918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petrophysical Properties (Density and Magnetization) of Rocks from the Suhbaatar‐Ulaanbaatar‐Dalandzadgad Geophysical Profile in Mongolia and Their Implications

Abstract: Petrophysical properties of 585 rock samples from the Suhbaatar-Ulaanbaatar-Dalandzadgad geophysical profile in Mongolia are presented. Based on the rock classifications and tectonic units, petrophysical parameters (bulk density, magnetic susceptibility, intensity of natural remanent magnetization, and Köenigsberger ratio) of these rocks are summarized. Results indicate that (1) significant density contrast of different rocks would result in variable gravity anomalies along the profile; (2) magnetic susceptibi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Open Journal of Civil Engineering An average density value of 2.63 g/cm 3 was established for all clasts in general, based on measurements from 19 samples. This value lies in the lower part of the range reported for most igneous rocks, which supports the identification of the clasts as rocks of felsic to intermediate composition [45] and corresponds to the geology reported by the Mexican Geological Survey [27].…”
Section: Grain Analysessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Open Journal of Civil Engineering An average density value of 2.63 g/cm 3 was established for all clasts in general, based on measurements from 19 samples. This value lies in the lower part of the range reported for most igneous rocks, which supports the identification of the clasts as rocks of felsic to intermediate composition [45] and corresponds to the geology reported by the Mexican Geological Survey [27].…”
Section: Grain Analysessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…More recently, some papers have established rules and protocols and/or have compiled petrophysical properties in certain regions (e.g. García-Lobón, Rey-Moral, Arias-Llorente, Cueto-Pascual, & Gómez-Paccard, 2003;García-Lobón, Rey-Moral, & Ayala 2006;Hemant & Maus, 2005;Rybakov, Goldshmidt, Rotstein, Fleischer, & Goldberg, 1999;Yang, Gao, Gu, Dagva, & Tserenpil, 2013). These databases, when the data are properly published (georeferenced, fully described, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial magnetic susceptibilities and NRM of Riverlands samples have a difference of two orders of magnitude. A possible reason for the difference can be variability in the mineralogy and chemical composition of the stones (Yang et al, 2013). RL2 has the lowest susceptibility and weakest NRM among all experimented stones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The difference may be due to variability in the mineralogy and chemical composition of the stones (Yang et al, 2013). The susceptibility of stones OP1 and OP2 increased with rises in temperature up to 300°C, and, in the other stones, increased with rises in temperature up to 500°C.…”
Section: Thermomagnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%