The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petrophysical Properties and Capacity of Prospective Structures for Geological Storage of CO2 Onshore and Offshore Baltic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Velocities were measured in two directions (X and Y) to consider anisotropy. Shogenov et al (2013) reported petrophysical properties of new samples from reservoirs of the E6 and E7 structures, which were determined and compared to old data. More detailed description of petrophysical methods is presented here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Velocities were measured in two directions (X and Y) to consider anisotropy. Shogenov et al (2013) reported petrophysical properties of new samples from reservoirs of the E6 and E7 structures, which were determined and compared to old data. More detailed description of petrophysical methods is presented here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 storage efficiency factor is the volume of CO 2 that could be stored in reservoir per unit volume of original fluids in place. In our previous study we used a different S ef for each structure based on its reservoir properties and employed different methods to estimate these factors (Shogenov et al, 2013). Following Bachu et al, (2007), the efficiency factors 10 % and 20 % in the E6 and E7 offshore structures were estimated respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations