2018
DOI: 10.1306/aapg117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petroleum Basins and Hydrocarbon Potential of the Andes of Peru and Bolivia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…245-220 Ma Mitu Group were deposited within NNW-trending grabens (e.g., Spikings et al, 2016). As mentioned in the introduction of Section 3, early Sub-Andean basin formation during syn-rift Mitu Group deposition was controlled by Paleozoic basement structural inhomogeneities, e.g., resulting in the formation of structural highs, such as the Iquitos arch, that represent sub-parallel, NNW-trending boundaries of basins or sub-basins (e.g., Marañon basin, Figure 2C; Zamora and Gil, 2018). Also, the reader is encouraged to compare the alignment of the Contaya arch with the sub-parallel Famatinian Paracas suture and the Rondonian-San-Ignacio and Sunsás orogenic fronts (Figure 3).…”
Section: Late Paleozoic Gondwanide Orogenic Cycles and Permian-triass...mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…245-220 Ma Mitu Group were deposited within NNW-trending grabens (e.g., Spikings et al, 2016). As mentioned in the introduction of Section 3, early Sub-Andean basin formation during syn-rift Mitu Group deposition was controlled by Paleozoic basement structural inhomogeneities, e.g., resulting in the formation of structural highs, such as the Iquitos arch, that represent sub-parallel, NNW-trending boundaries of basins or sub-basins (e.g., Marañon basin, Figure 2C; Zamora and Gil, 2018). Also, the reader is encouraged to compare the alignment of the Contaya arch with the sub-parallel Famatinian Paracas suture and the Rondonian-San-Ignacio and Sunsás orogenic fronts (Figure 3).…”
Section: Late Paleozoic Gondwanide Orogenic Cycles and Permian-triass...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Frontiers in Earth Science frontiersin.org fact, the boundaries of sub-Andean basins have been correlated with the structural segmentation of the Andes (e.g., Jacques, 2003). Furthermore, basin formation in the sub-Andes has been ascribed to early Permian-Triassic extension that was accommodated by inherited basement structural inhomogeneities, with major implications for oil and gas potential (e.g., Calderon et al, 2017;Zamora and Gil, 2018). More importantly, however, we must appreciate the mosaic-like distribution of micro-terranes and crustal blocks, and their respective boundaries, along the western South American margin (Figure 2C).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant oil and gas reserves and strategic metals lie in foreland basins (e.g. Biddle et al, 1986; Jaskula, 2020; Kendall et al, 2019; Pindell et al, 2005; Rodriguez et al, 2020; Saura et al, 2015; Verges et al, 2011; Zamora et al, 2018). Some regions display an interplay between foreland basins and backarc basins (Bertello et al, 2010; Doust & Noble, 2008; Escalona & Mann, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the current morphology and structure result from a margin compression of converging plates since the Late Cretaceous, the Peruvian and Bolivian margin specifically preserves a rich superposition of deformation events in both compressional and extensional tectonics (Jaillard et al, 2000; Ramos, 2008, 2018; Ramos & Folguera, 2009). The knowledge on the geology of the Central Andes (sensu Gansser, 1973) in Peru and Bolivia advanced through several multidisciplinary studies addressing geodynamic and tectonic issues to purely stratigraphic and sedimentary issues (e.g., Baby et al, 2009; Bicudo et al, 2019; Espurt et al, 2008; Horton, 2018a; Jacques, 2003; Rojas Vera et al, 2019; Zamora et al, 2018). A number of these studies were driven by the search for new petroleum plays in the local basins generically known as sub‐Andean (sensu Armijo et al, 2015; Baby et al, 2018; Boschman, 2021; Suárez et al, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%