Petrogenesis of silica-rich carbonatites from continental rift settings: a missing link between carbonatites and carbonated silicate melts?

Abstract

Four carbonatite bodies (Sukulu and Tororo -Uganda, Lemitar Mts. and Iron Hill -USA) from two intracontinental rift systems containing a prominent silicocarbonatite-carbonatite association were studied in detail in terms of petrography, major-/trace-element chemistry, and Sr-Nd-C-O isotope systematics to provide constraints on their petrogenesis and mutual relationship. The Sukulu and Tororo carbonatites (< 30 Ma) within the East African Rift System are characterized by the wide range of SiO 2 contents and presence of phlogopite ± olivine and aegirine-augite + K-feldspar, respectively. These different mineral parageneses correspond to the Mg-K-rich nature of the former and Na-Fe-K-rich composition of the latter. Overall, these signatures can be best explained by progressive fractionation of parental carbonated silicate melts and liquid immiscibility documented by the chemical variation of clinopyroxene and the presence of silicate-carbonate pockets. However, at Tororo, this process was likely accompanied by assimilation of local crustal lithologies to account for its different Sr-Nd isotopic signatures and Na-rich nature of carbonatites. Despite their spatial and temporal difference, the Lemitar Mts. and Iron Hill from the Cambro-Ordovician North American Rift resemble similar petrography and mineralogy as Sukulu and Tororo bodies, expressed by the presence of phlogopite and clinopyroxene + K-feldspar. We present a general model explaining the origin of silicocarbonatite-carbonatite association involving segregation of silicate and carbonate melts from parental carbonated silicate melts through a process of liquid immiscibility. Subsequent distinct evolutionary paths are related to differences in Si-Na-K-Fe-Mg and H 2 O-F contents, oxygen fugacity, and melt ascent efficiency, perhaps related to crustal assimilation. Therefore, we emphasize that relatively silica-rich carbonatites represent a crucial linkage between silicate and carbonate melts.

The genesis of calcite and dolomite carbonatite-forming magma by liquid immiscibility: a critical appraisal

“…The presumed ‘bimodality’ is actually fallacious and results from rigid adherence to otiose IUGS nomenclature (Le Maitre, 2002), which restricts the use of the name ‘carbonatite’ to those rocks containing more than 50 modal per cent primary carbonate and less than 10 wt.% silica. The failings of this nomenclature with respect to carbonatite petrogenesis have been addressed by Mitchell (2005b), Gittins et al (2005), Tappe et al (2020), Ackerman et al (2021) and Mitchell and Gittins (2022). Curiously, rocks that provide direct textural and mineralogical evidence of gradational relationships between silicate and carbonate rocks, such as calcite pyroxenites and pyroxene calcite carbonatites, are ignored or downplayed in importance.…”

Interaction of seawater with (ultra)mafic alkaline rocks—Alternative process for the formation of aegirine

“…DOI: https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2023-8928. http://www.minsocam.org/ of marine sediments (e.g., Fortey and Michie 1978;McSwiggen et al 1994), and in Na-rich magmatic rocks including carbonatites (e.g., Woolley et al 1995;Chakhmouradian and Mitchell 2002;Ackerman et al 2021). Its hydrothermal origin at temperatures around ~200°C was experimentally proven as well (Decarreau et al 2004).…”