2013
DOI: 10.26493/1855-3974.288.11a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petersen-colorings and some families of snarks

Abstract: In this paper we study Petersen-colorings and strong Petersen-colorings on some well known families of snarks, e.g. Blanuša snarks, Goldberg snarks and flower snarks. In particular, it is shown that flower snarks have a Petersen-coloring but they do not have a strong Petersen-coloring. Furthermore it is proved that possible minimum counterexamples to Jaeger's Petersen-coloring conjecture do not contain a specific subdivision of K 3,3 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…i is a cycle of length 5 of S-degree 1, 6 written v ′ i u 1 u 2 u 3 u 4 such that u 2 is its unique vertex incident to an edge in S. If C u ′ 2 is a cycle of S-degree 2 then C sends 1/5 to C u ′ 2 through v i .…”
Section: (R1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…i is a cycle of length 5 of S-degree 1, 6 written v ′ i u 1 u 2 u 3 u 4 such that u 2 is its unique vertex incident to an edge in S. If C u ′ 2 is a cycle of S-degree 2 then C sends 1/5 to C u ′ 2 through v i .…”
Section: (R1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite original approaches [10][11][12], few progress has been made on the Petersen colouring conjecture: ways to infirm it remain elusive as possible counter-examples must be snarks, that is bridgeless cubic graphs that are not 3-edge-colourable (the ones we know are usually obtained from well-structured graph operations, for which the Petersen colouring conjecture can be verified [2,6]), and confirming the conjecture is expected to be a difficult task since as reported earlier this would confirm several difficult and most researched graph conjectures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the non-3edge-colorable cubic graphs are the main obstacle for proving Conjecture 3. Let us note that in [6] Conjecture 3 is verified for some non-3-edge-colorable bridgeless cubic graphs. Also, in [16] the percentage of edges of a bridgeless cubic graph, which can be made normal in a 5-edge-coloring, is estimated.…”
Section: Normal 5-edge-coloringsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The importance of H-colourings is mainly due to Jaeger's Conjecture [14] which states that each bridgeless cubic graph G admits a P -colouring (where P is again the Petersen graph). For recent results on P -colourings, known as Petersen-colourings, see for instance [12,13,26,29]. The following proposition shows why we choose to refer to a pair of perfect matchings whose deletion leaves a bipartite subgraph as an S 4 -pair.…”
Section: Statements Equivalent To the S -Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%