2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0968-0004(02)02059-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peter Mitchell and the ox phos wars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obtaining these extra protons for coupling presents another insurmountable problem for the chemiosmotic theory. With this background, it is now possible to historically understand why Mitchell refused to accept the higher values of H + /O and H + /ATP ratios than the ones he had postulated in his theory, even in the face of the most incontrovertible experimental evidence, as documented by Prebble [ 49 ]. These stoichiometries were central and fundamental to chemiosmosis, and acceptance of the higher numbers would have created a severe energy crisis for the chemiosmotic theory and sounded the death-knell for it.…”
Section: Fundamental Consequences Of the Torsional Mechanism The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining these extra protons for coupling presents another insurmountable problem for the chemiosmotic theory. With this background, it is now possible to historically understand why Mitchell refused to accept the higher values of H + /O and H + /ATP ratios than the ones he had postulated in his theory, even in the face of the most incontrovertible experimental evidence, as documented by Prebble [ 49 ]. These stoichiometries were central and fundamental to chemiosmosis, and acceptance of the higher numbers would have created a severe energy crisis for the chemiosmotic theory and sounded the death-knell for it.…”
Section: Fundamental Consequences Of the Torsional Mechanism The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The redox loops proposed by Mitchell were also wrong. More seriously, as noticed by many observers (Malmström 2000;Prebble 2002), both the export of protons from the mitochondria and the synthesis of ATP were seen by Mitchell as direct consequences of the orientation of chemical reactions. In the present model, the movement of protons is also due to their being pumped through the membrane, a consequence of the transconformation of the proteins involved in electron transport (Wikström 1977;Verkhovsky et al 1999).…”
Section: The Present Chemiosmotic Model Is Not the Model Proposed By mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Entropy enthalpy compensation has been widely observed in different systems (Prebble 2002;Agutter and Wheatley 2004;Nielsen and Jensen 1990;Rottenberg 1979;Izumida and Okuda 2008). A close inspection reveals that till this date there has not been any satisfactory thermodynamic theory that explains this compensation.…”
Section: A New Insight Towards Enthalpy Entropy Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A kinetically coupled reaction pair has common intermediate (chemical species). While this kinetic nomenclature for coupling has a broad range of validity, it fails to interpret coupling reactions in absence of common intermediates this being a fundamental attribute of all forms of chemisomotic controls (Prebble 2002). There is however a general approach based on near equilibrium thermodynamics that permits an explicit definition of thermodynamic coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%