2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-1023-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PET should not replace routine SPECT MPS for the assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of SPECT in diagnosing CMVD is its higher sensitivity. Compared with PET, SPECT is cheaper ( 30 ), so it is more frequently-used in the clinic.…”
Section: Research Progress Of Imaging Methods For Detection Of Microvascular Angina Pectorismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of SPECT in diagnosing CMVD is its higher sensitivity. Compared with PET, SPECT is cheaper ( 30 ), so it is more frequently-used in the clinic.…”
Section: Research Progress Of Imaging Methods For Detection Of Microvascular Angina Pectorismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A normal study is a prognostic indicator of a <1% annual risk of a coronary event, while an abnormal MPS indicates a seven-fold likelihood of acute myocardial infarction within 10 years when compared with the normal group. 3 Radiation doses have reduced significantly in recent years, as for all imaging associated with ionising radiation.…”
Section: Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfus...mentioning
confidence: 99%