The Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS) (Goldberg, Brintnell, & Goldberg, 2002) demonstrated sufficient psychometric properties in sample (N = 122) of adults. The EMAS was found to have adequate test-retest (r = .71) and internal consistency reliability (α = .88), significant positive correlations between the EMAS and the subscales of the Basic Psychological Needs Scale and the Sources of Meaning Profile and negative zero-order correlations were found with short form versions of the Boredom Proneness Scale and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales.Step-wise multiple regression analyses results showed the Sources of Meaning Profile, Boredom Proneness Scale, and Competence subscale of the Basic Psychological Needs scale best predicted the EMAS. These results lend additional construct validity evidence in support of the EMAS as a brief measure of meaningful activity participation. asserted that occupational therapy has privileged goal-oriented purposeful occupations despite a lack of substantive evidence. Further, she argues that differing perspectives on activity purpose and meaning have hampered theory development in occupational therapy. As an example, Nelson (1988Nelson ( , 1996 has posited the critical importance of interpreting meaning from an occupational form as a basis for establishing the purpose of a given activity. However, Trombly (1995) has suggested that activity meaning is necessarily informed by its purpose and the perceived value of task accomplishment. According to Trombly, an activity with a clear therapeutic purpose may have no inherent meaning to an individual. Though Fisher (1998) had attempted to reconcile this discrepancy, empirical data explicating the differential functioning of activity meaning and purpose are limited (Ferguson & Trombly, 1997).More recent perspectives in occupational therapy and occupational science contextualize meaningful activity within the life-course, and tend to favor sociocultural and phenomenological approaches to understanding human experience. For instance, Crabtree (1998) speculated that intrinsic motivation drives occupational performance, thereby imbuing activity with meaning.Additionally, Jackson, Carlson, Mandel, Zemke, and Clark (1998) support the importance of accessing personal values and experiences as critical constituents of activity meaning (i.e., Csikszentmihalyi, 1990;Kaufman, 1986;Schultz & Heckhausen, 1996). Further, Christiansen 4 (1999) proposed that competence, personal identity, and the social nature of a person's life serve to situate activity meaning within the life course thereby contributing to a sense of life purpose and meaning. Finally, attributing meaning to activity is considered to be dynamic and changeable, necessitating narrative and sociocultural perspectives to explain the complexity of the underlying processes (Jonsson & Josephsson, 2005).By incorporating multiple theories from the fields of occupational therapy, nursing, social work, and psychology King (2004) has proffered a meta-model of meaning i...