1993
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199309000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PET-FDG Test-Retest Reliability During a Visual Discrimination Task in Schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visual interpretation of the PET and SPECT images, as performed by independent and experienced observers with reference to normal databases obtained in our own laboratory (13,(20)(21)(22) and from previous studies (23)(24)(25)(26)(27), was sufficient to identify lesions. In addition, according to the previous studies (28)(29)(30)(31)(32), the reader reproducibilities for visual interpretation of PET and SPECT images are good. Therefore, in this study, we selected visual interpretation instead of a quantitative or semiquantitative method.…”
Section: Kao Et Almentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The visual interpretation of the PET and SPECT images, as performed by independent and experienced observers with reference to normal databases obtained in our own laboratory (13,(20)(21)(22) and from previous studies (23)(24)(25)(26)(27), was sufficient to identify lesions. In addition, according to the previous studies (28)(29)(30)(31)(32), the reader reproducibilities for visual interpretation of PET and SPECT images are good. Therefore, in this study, we selected visual interpretation instead of a quantitative or semiquantitative method.…”
Section: Kao Et Almentioning
confidence: 62%
“…As described in the “Introduction” section, percent test-retest (PTRT) is a ubiquitous measure in PET brain imaging although it is not often used in other related fields. In early PET test-retest papers, signed (or raw) mean normalized test-retest differences were considered [ 16 , 17 ], but later authors generally used the absolute values of the normalized differences instead [ 18 ]. Following this latter definition, PTRT is calculated as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown in test‐retest neuroimaging studies that the use of a standard task (vs. a ‘rest’ task) reduces inherent between‐subject and day‐to‐day regional CMRglu variability (Duara et al . 1987; Holcomb et al . 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%