2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PET bottles seal quality testing using an on-line pressure differential detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…at 550 MPa for 10 min. All the samples were packed in polyethylene terephthalate bottles (100 mL) to a headspace depth of approximately 3 cm (Sivaramakrishna et al., 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at 550 MPa for 10 min. All the samples were packed in polyethylene terephthalate bottles (100 mL) to a headspace depth of approximately 3 cm (Sivaramakrishna et al., 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the seal quality of brick-type packages using the pressure differential leak tester, the distance between the vertical conveyor belts and thus the force on the packages were optimized. Sivaramakrishna, Raspante, Palaniappan, and Pascall (2007) describes this equipment and how it works to test the quality of induction seals and plastic caps on PET bottles. A modification of this method was used for leak testing of the brick-type packages.…”
Section: The Pressure Differential Leak Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If leak detection, as described in this study, is to be used to perform online leak testing of these packages, the detector must be positioned before the folding steps along the production line. The remainder of the optimization of the leak tester and the establishment of the pass/fail threshold was performed similar to the procedure Sivaramakrishna et al (2007) established for the PET bottles. As will be described later on in this paper, there were also significant differences in the method of creating leaks in the seals, dye testing and seal strength determination between the bricktype packages and the PET bottles.…”
Section: The Pressure Differential Leak Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the requirements of container closure integrity impose high standards of maintaining sterility [3]. There are several conventional methods for testing the vial closure, such as blue dye ingress, pressure rise measurement, residual gas analysis and high voltage leak inspection, but they cannot give quantitative measurements [4][5][6][7][8]. Some methods like low temperature infrared spectroscopy [9], pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance [10] and X-ray diffractometry [11] have been implemented for on-line and non-destructive testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%